Health-Related Resource-Use Measurement Instruments for Intersectoral Costs and Benefits in the Education and Criminal Justice Sectors

Susanne Mayer*, Aggie T. G. Paulus, Agata Laszewska, Judit Simon, Ruben M. W. A. Drost, Dirk Ruwaard, Silvia M. A. A. Evers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Background Intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs), i.e. costs and benefits of healthcare interventions outside the healthcare sector, can be a crucial component in economic evaluations from the societal perspective. Pivotal to their estimation is the existence of sound resource-use measurement (RUM) instruments; however, RUM instruments for ICBs in the education or criminal justice sectors have not yet been systematically collated or their psychometric quality assessed. This review aims to fill this gap.

Methods To identify relevant instruments, the Database of Instruments for Resource Use Measurement (DIRUM) was searched. Additionally, a systematic literature review was conducted in seven electronic databases to detect instruments containing ICB items used in economic evaluations. Finally, studies evaluating the psychometric quality of these instruments were searched.

Results Twenty-six unique instruments were included. Most frequently, ICB items measured school absenteeism, tutoring, classroom assistance or contacts with legal representatives, police custody/prison detainment and court appearances, with the highest number of items listed in the Client Service Receipt Inventory/Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory/Client Service Receipt Inventory-Children's Version (CSRI/CSSRI/CSRI-C), Studying the Scope of Parental Expenditures (SCOPE) and Self-Harm Intervention, Family Therapy (SHIFT) instruments. ICBs in the education sector were especially relevant for age-related developmental disorders and chronic diseases, while criminal justice resource use seems more important in mental health, including alcohol-related disorders or substance abuse. Evidence on the validity or reliability of ICB items was published for two instruments only.

Conclusion With a heterogeneous variety of ICBs found to be relevant for several disease areas but many ICB instruments applied in one study only (21/26 instruments), setting-up an international task force to, for example, develop an internationally adaptable instrument is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)895-908
Number of pages14
JournalPharmacoeconomics
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
  • INFORMAL CARE
  • TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT
  • PRODUCTIVITY COSTS
  • SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
  • OF-ILLNESS
  • IMPACT
  • INTERVENTIONS
  • QUESTIONNAIRES

Cite this