Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Maastricht University
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Dataset/Software
Projects
Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI)
Pirkko Nykanen
*
, Jytte Brender
, Jan Talmon
, Nicolette de Keizer
, Michael Rigby
, Marie-Catherine Beuscart-Zephir
, Elske Ammenwerth
*
Corresponding author for this work
Health, Safety & Buildings FHML-FPN
CAPHRI - Care and Public Health Research Institute
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
Academic
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Evaluation Practice
100%
Good Evaluation
100%
Health Informatics
100%
Risk Management
25%
Robustness Evaluation
25%
Best Practice Guidelines
25%
Plan Implementation
25%
Project Planning
25%
All-phase
25%
Evaluation Results
25%
Management Control
25%
Evidence-based Health Informatics
25%
Project Execution
25%
Project Control
25%
Project Completion
25%
INIS
evaluation
100%
guidelines
100%
planning
18%
applications
9%
increasing
9%
control
9%
risks
9%
design
9%
management
9%
conferences
9%
implementation
9%
Computer Science
Evaluation Practice
100%
Evaluation Study
100%
Evaluation Result
14%
Risk Management
14%
Project Planning
14%