Great debate: device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation should be treated like clinical atrial fibrillation

Prashanthan Sanders*, Emma Svennberg, Søren Z Diederichsen, Harry J G M Crijns, Pier D Lambiase, Giuseppe Boriani, Isabelle C Van Gelder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Summary of the factors representing the equipoise associated with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation to inform patient-specific treatment. AF, atrial fibrillation; CIED, cardiac implantable electronic device; OAC, oral anticoagulation; QoL, quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2594-2603
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume45
Issue number29
Early online date27 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation burden
  • Device-detected atrial fibrillation
  • Oral anticoagulation
  • Subclinical atrial fibrillation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Great debate: device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation should be treated like clinical atrial fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this