General Principles of Law, Judicial Creativity and the Development of International Criminal Law

F. Raimondo*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

This chapter examines the manner in which the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals have utilized general principles of law in filling substantive and procedural legal gaps. While general principles of law are recognized as secondary sources of law under Article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, they have nevertheless acted as important springboards towards judicial creativity in the international criminal law context. This chapter examines some of the relevant case-law and shows that general principles of law as identified by the bench have been used to surmount statutory lacunae. Of particular interest in this regard is the ad hoc Tribunals' reliance on notions pertaining to their inherent powers in order to examine issues such as institutional legitimacy and obstruction of justice. The chapter concludes with a comment on the prospects for the future role of general principles of law in the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJudicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals
EditorsS. Darcy, J. Powderly
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages45-59
ISBN (Print)978-0199591466
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General Principles of Law, Judicial Creativity and the Development of International Criminal Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this