Functionalism, Multiple Principals and the Reform of the NATO Secretariat after the Cold War

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
502 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The literature on international organizations tells us that diverging member states’ preferences and concerns about the loss of control are major obstacles to institutional reform. But what if changes in the international environment necessitate institutional reform? This article examines such dilemma in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO has faced functional pressures to adjust its machinery to the post-Cold War era, but has at the same time seen its membership and the preference heterogeneity of the membership increase. The article finds that institutional change is indeed difficult with multiple principals and uncertainty about the consequences of reform. Yet modest reform has still taken place. Firstly, strong functional pressures can help the member states to overcome their differences concerning institutional reform. Secondly, lower-level incremental reforms, beyond the control of the member states, have made NATO a more efficient organization. The empirical focus is on the development of the understudied International Staff post-1989.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-145
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Cite this

@article{505209e0acd74cbaad18c31494f79f3e,
title = "Functionalism, Multiple Principals and the Reform of the NATO Secretariat after the Cold War",
abstract = "The literature on international organizations tells us that diverging member states’ preferences and concerns about the loss of control are major obstacles to institutional reform. But what if changes in the international environment necessitate institutional reform? This article examines such dilemma in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO has faced functional pressures to adjust its machinery to the post-Cold War era, but has at the same time seen its membership and the preference heterogeneity of the membership increase. The article finds that institutional change is indeed difficult with multiple principals and uncertainty about the consequences of reform. Yet modest reform has still taken place. Firstly, strong functional pressures can help the member states to overcome their differences concerning institutional reform. Secondly, lower-level incremental reforms, beyond the control of the member states, have made NATO a more efficient organization. The empirical focus is on the development of the understudied International Staff post-1989.",
author = "H. Dijkstra",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010836714532919",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "128--145",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Functionalism, Multiple Principals and the Reform of the NATO Secretariat after the Cold War. / Dijkstra, H.

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 128-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functionalism, Multiple Principals and the Reform of the NATO Secretariat after the Cold War

AU - Dijkstra, H.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The literature on international organizations tells us that diverging member states’ preferences and concerns about the loss of control are major obstacles to institutional reform. But what if changes in the international environment necessitate institutional reform? This article examines such dilemma in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO has faced functional pressures to adjust its machinery to the post-Cold War era, but has at the same time seen its membership and the preference heterogeneity of the membership increase. The article finds that institutional change is indeed difficult with multiple principals and uncertainty about the consequences of reform. Yet modest reform has still taken place. Firstly, strong functional pressures can help the member states to overcome their differences concerning institutional reform. Secondly, lower-level incremental reforms, beyond the control of the member states, have made NATO a more efficient organization. The empirical focus is on the development of the understudied International Staff post-1989.

AB - The literature on international organizations tells us that diverging member states’ preferences and concerns about the loss of control are major obstacles to institutional reform. But what if changes in the international environment necessitate institutional reform? This article examines such dilemma in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO has faced functional pressures to adjust its machinery to the post-Cold War era, but has at the same time seen its membership and the preference heterogeneity of the membership increase. The article finds that institutional change is indeed difficult with multiple principals and uncertainty about the consequences of reform. Yet modest reform has still taken place. Firstly, strong functional pressures can help the member states to overcome their differences concerning institutional reform. Secondly, lower-level incremental reforms, beyond the control of the member states, have made NATO a more efficient organization. The empirical focus is on the development of the understudied International Staff post-1989.

U2 - 10.1177/0010836714532919

DO - 10.1177/0010836714532919

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 128

EP - 145

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 1

ER -