From Three-Months to Five-Years: Sustaining Long-Term Benefits of Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke

A. Ganesh, J.M. Ospel, M. Marko, W.H. van Zwam, Y.B.W.E.M. Roos, C.B.L.M. Majoie, M. Goyal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

1 Citation (Web of Science)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: During the months and years post-stroke, treatment benefits from endovascular therapy (EVT) may be magnified by disability-related differences in morbidity/mortality or may be eroded by recurrent strokes and non-stroke-related disability/mortality. Understanding the extent to which EVT benefits may be sustained at 5 years, and the factors influencing this outcome, may help us better promote the sustenance of EVT benefits until 5 years post-stroke and beyond. Methods: In this review, undertaken 5 years after EVT became the standard of care, we searched PubMed and EMBASE to examine the current state of the literature on 5-year post-stroke outcomes, with particular attention to modifiable factors that influence outcomes between 3 months and 5 years post-EVT. Results: Prospective cohorts and follow-up data from EVT trials indicate that 3-month EVT benefits will likely translate into lower 5-year disability, mortality, institutionalization, and care costs and higher quality of life. However, these group-level data by no means guarantee maintenance of 3-month benefits for individual patients. We identify factors and associated "action items" for stroke teams/systems at three specific levels (medical care, individual psychosocioeconomic, and larger societal/environmental levels) that influence the long-term EVT outcome of a patient. Medical action items include optimizing stroke rehabilitation, clinical follow-up, secondary stroke prevention, infection prevention/control, and post-stroke depression care. Psychosocioeconomic aspects include addressing access to primary care, specialist clinics, and rehabilitation; affordability of healthy lifestyle choices and preventative therapies; and optimization of family/social support and return-to-work options. High-level societal efforts include improving accessibility of public/private spaces and transportation, empowering/engaging persons with disability in society, and investing in treatments/technologies to mitigate consequences of post-stroke disability. Conclusions: In the longtime horizon from 3 months to 5 years, several factors in the medical and societal spheres could negate EVT benefits. However, many factors can be leveraged to preserve or magnify treatment benefits, with opportunities to share responsibility with widening circles of care around the patient.
Original languageEnglish
Article number713738
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in Neurology
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • cerebrovascular disease
  • ischemic stroke
  • endovascular treatment
  • long-term outcome
  • post-acute care
  • MODIFIED-RANKIN-SCALE
  • POSTTREATMENT INFARCT VOLUMES
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS
  • MEDICATION ADHERENCE
  • 1ST-EVER STROKE
  • COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
  • SECONDARY PREVENTION
  • PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS
  • NATURAL-HISTORY

Cite this