From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns

Vlada Druță; Aurelia Tamo - Larrieux; Clement Guitton; Gijs van Dijck

From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns

Vlada Druță^*, Aurelia Tamo - Larrieux, Clement Guitton, Gijs van Dijck

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceeding › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Digital RAIs raise significant concerns, including opacity and discrimination. However, limited to no knowledge exists on the transition from analogue to digital RAIs and on reasons for non-adoption of technology. To investigate this, we reviewed newspaper archives for debates on RAIs and conducted interviews with high-ranking officials from Moldova. The study yielded considerations for the nonadoption of RAIs and the (non-)transition from analogue to digital RAIs. It highlighted a gap: The lack of a unified theory for technology non-adoption, which can be addressed by drawing insights from innovation resistance and adoption theories.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2024
Number of pages	2
Volume	3737
Publication status	Published - 20 Aug 2024

Publication series

Series	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Number	49
Volume	3737
ISSN	1613-0073

Access to Document

https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3737/paper49.pdfLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@inproceedings{166aca02c000466290d49526578bf438,

title = "From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns",

abstract = "Digital RAIs raise significant concerns, including opacity and discrimination. However, limited to no knowledge exists on the transition from analogue to digital RAIs and on reasons for non-adoption of technology. To investigate this, we reviewed newspaper archives for debates on RAIs and conducted interviews with high-ranking officials from Moldova. The study yielded considerations for the nonadoption of RAIs and the (non-)transition from analogue to digital RAIs. It highlighted a gap: The lack of a unified theory for technology non-adoption, which can be addressed by drawing insights from innovation resistance and adoption theories.",

author = "Vlada Druț{\u a} and {Tamo - Larrieux}, Aurelia and Clement Guitton and {van Dijck}, Gijs",

year = "2024",

month = aug,

day = "20",

language = "English",

volume = "3737 ",

series = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

publisher = "Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule Aachen * Lehrstuhl Informatik V",

number = "49",

booktitle = "Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2024",

}

Druță, V, Tamo - Larrieux, A, Guitton, C & van Dijck, G 2024, From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns. in Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2024. vol. 3737 , CEUR Workshop Proceedings, no. 49, vol. 3737. <https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3737/paper49.pdf>

From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns. / Druță, Vlada; Tamo - Larrieux, Aurelia; Guitton, Clement et al.
Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2024. Vol. 3737 2024. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings; No. 49, Vol. 3737).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceeding › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns

AU - Druță, Vlada

AU - Tamo - Larrieux, Aurelia

AU - Guitton, Clement

AU - van Dijck, Gijs

PY - 2024/8/20

Y1 - 2024/8/20

N2 - Digital RAIs raise significant concerns, including opacity and discrimination. However, limited to no knowledge exists on the transition from analogue to digital RAIs and on reasons for non-adoption of technology. To investigate this, we reviewed newspaper archives for debates on RAIs and conducted interviews with high-ranking officials from Moldova. The study yielded considerations for the nonadoption of RAIs and the (non-)transition from analogue to digital RAIs. It highlighted a gap: The lack of a unified theory for technology non-adoption, which can be addressed by drawing insights from innovation resistance and adoption theories.

AB - Digital RAIs raise significant concerns, including opacity and discrimination. However, limited to no knowledge exists on the transition from analogue to digital RAIs and on reasons for non-adoption of technology. To investigate this, we reviewed newspaper archives for debates on RAIs and conducted interviews with high-ranking officials from Moldova. The study yielded considerations for the nonadoption of RAIs and the (non-)transition from analogue to digital RAIs. It highlighted a gap: The lack of a unified theory for technology non-adoption, which can be addressed by drawing insights from innovation resistance and adoption theories.

M3 - Conference article in proceeding

VL - 3737

T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

BT - Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2024

ER -

From Analog Risk Assessment Instruments to Digital Ones: Mapping the Concerns

Abstract

Publication series

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this