Fragmented or Cohesive Transnational Private Regulation of Sustainability Standards? A Comparative Study

L. Fransen, T. Conzelmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Literature on private regulation recognizes the proliferation of competing regulatory organizations and approaches in various industries. Studies analyzing why fragmentation arises so far focus on single-case studies, the exploration of single variables, or variation in types of fragmentation. This article analyzes why in certain industries and for certain issues regulatory organizations proliferate, while in others a single regulatory organization emerges which covers the entire industry. Through a comparative case study of private regulation of sustainability standards in the forestry, clothing, IT-electronics, and chemicals industries, we show how a combination of low industrial concentration, civil society involvement in governance, and stringent standards of a first-moving regulator offer the strongest explanation for a fragmented private regulatory field, while high industrial concentration, business-driven governance, and lenient standards of a first-moving regulator lead to cohesive regulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-275
Number of pages17
JournalRegulation & Governance
Volume9
Issue number3
Early online date27 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

Keywords

  • COLLECTIVE ACTION
  • EMERGENCE
  • GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
  • LABOR STANDARDS
  • MARKET
  • ORGANIZATIONS
  • VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL-PROGRAMS
  • corporate social responsibility
  • private regulation
  • regime complexity
  • regulatory competition
  • sustainability

Cite this

@article{956fab9b98654873b746523a401593a1,
title = "Fragmented or Cohesive Transnational Private Regulation of Sustainability Standards? A Comparative Study",
abstract = "Literature on private regulation recognizes the proliferation of competing regulatory organizations and approaches in various industries. Studies analyzing why fragmentation arises so far focus on single-case studies, the exploration of single variables, or variation in types of fragmentation. This article analyzes why in certain industries and for certain issues regulatory organizations proliferate, while in others a single regulatory organization emerges which covers the entire industry. Through a comparative case study of private regulation of sustainability standards in the forestry, clothing, IT-electronics, and chemicals industries, we show how a combination of low industrial concentration, civil society involvement in governance, and stringent standards of a first-moving regulator offer the strongest explanation for a fragmented private regulatory field, while high industrial concentration, business-driven governance, and lenient standards of a first-moving regulator lead to cohesive regulation.",
keywords = "COLLECTIVE ACTION, EMERGENCE, GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, LABOR STANDARDS, MARKET, ORGANIZATIONS, VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL-PROGRAMS, corporate social responsibility, private regulation, regime complexity, regulatory competition, sustainability",
author = "L. Fransen and T. Conzelmann",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/rego.12055",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "259--275",
journal = "Regulation & Governance",
issn = "1748-5983",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Fragmented or Cohesive Transnational Private Regulation of Sustainability Standards? A Comparative Study. / Fransen, L.; Conzelmann, T.

In: Regulation & Governance, Vol. 9, No. 3, 09.2015, p. 259-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fragmented or Cohesive Transnational Private Regulation of Sustainability Standards? A Comparative Study

AU - Fransen, L.

AU - Conzelmann, T.

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - Literature on private regulation recognizes the proliferation of competing regulatory organizations and approaches in various industries. Studies analyzing why fragmentation arises so far focus on single-case studies, the exploration of single variables, or variation in types of fragmentation. This article analyzes why in certain industries and for certain issues regulatory organizations proliferate, while in others a single regulatory organization emerges which covers the entire industry. Through a comparative case study of private regulation of sustainability standards in the forestry, clothing, IT-electronics, and chemicals industries, we show how a combination of low industrial concentration, civil society involvement in governance, and stringent standards of a first-moving regulator offer the strongest explanation for a fragmented private regulatory field, while high industrial concentration, business-driven governance, and lenient standards of a first-moving regulator lead to cohesive regulation.

AB - Literature on private regulation recognizes the proliferation of competing regulatory organizations and approaches in various industries. Studies analyzing why fragmentation arises so far focus on single-case studies, the exploration of single variables, or variation in types of fragmentation. This article analyzes why in certain industries and for certain issues regulatory organizations proliferate, while in others a single regulatory organization emerges which covers the entire industry. Through a comparative case study of private regulation of sustainability standards in the forestry, clothing, IT-electronics, and chemicals industries, we show how a combination of low industrial concentration, civil society involvement in governance, and stringent standards of a first-moving regulator offer the strongest explanation for a fragmented private regulatory field, while high industrial concentration, business-driven governance, and lenient standards of a first-moving regulator lead to cohesive regulation.

KW - COLLECTIVE ACTION

KW - EMERGENCE

KW - GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

KW - LABOR STANDARDS

KW - MARKET

KW - ORGANIZATIONS

KW - VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL-PROGRAMS

KW - corporate social responsibility

KW - private regulation

KW - regime complexity

KW - regulatory competition

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.1111/rego.12055

DO - 10.1111/rego.12055

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 259

EP - 275

JO - Regulation & Governance

JF - Regulation & Governance

SN - 1748-5983

IS - 3

ER -