Formal and Informal Social Capital in Germany: The Role of Institutions and Ethnic Diversity

Mark Levels*, Peer Scheepers, Tim Huijts, Gerbert Kraaykamp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence for the often-posited negative relation between ethnic diversity and various measures of social capital is burdened by difficulties measuring the levels of aggregation at which the indicators operate, the common use of cross-sectional data, and by the common omission of macro-level variables that plausibly confound the relation between ethnic diversity and social capital. To overcome these problems, this article studies social capital in Germany. Germany has a sizeable immigrant population and a considerable within-country variation in the extent to which government institutions and the labour market function. Districts also have different democratic histories. To explore to what extent social capital can be explained by ethnic diversity and institutional characteristics of districts in Germany, we combine data from the German Socioeconomic Panel, with relevant macro-level characteristics at the level of districts (‘Kreise’). We use three-level multilevel regression analyses to study the 2003 data, and individual fixed effects panel regressions to study the consequences of changes between 2003 and 2008. Our findings indicate that ethnic diversity in districts has a negative effect on political participation. We find no evidence that ethnic diversity is related to other forms of social capital.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-779
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Sociological Review
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Keywords

  • MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS
  • NEIGHBORHOOD DIVERSITY
  • COHESION
  • TRUST
  • PARTICIPATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • PUTNAMS
  • EUROPE
  • IMPACT
  • STATE

Cite this

@article{937e533719f04c869690fa1df5c8d084,
title = "Formal and Informal Social Capital in Germany: The Role of Institutions and Ethnic Diversity",
abstract = "Evidence for the often-posited negative relation between ethnic diversity and various measures of social capital is burdened by difficulties measuring the levels of aggregation at which the indicators operate, the common use of cross-sectional data, and by the common omission of macro-level variables that plausibly confound the relation between ethnic diversity and social capital. To overcome these problems, this article studies social capital in Germany. Germany has a sizeable immigrant population and a considerable within-country variation in the extent to which government institutions and the labour market function. Districts also have different democratic histories. To explore to what extent social capital can be explained by ethnic diversity and institutional characteristics of districts in Germany, we combine data from the German Socioeconomic Panel, with relevant macro-level characteristics at the level of districts (‘Kreise’). We use three-level multilevel regression analyses to study the 2003 data, and individual fixed effects panel regressions to study the consequences of changes between 2003 and 2008. Our findings indicate that ethnic diversity in districts has a negative effect on political participation. We find no evidence that ethnic diversity is related to other forms of social capital.",
keywords = "MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS, NEIGHBORHOOD DIVERSITY, COHESION, TRUST, PARTICIPATION, COMMUNITY, PUTNAMS, EUROPE, IMPACT, STATE",
author = "Mark Levels and Peer Scheepers and Tim Huijts and Gerbert Kraaykamp",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/esr/jcv075",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "766--779",
journal = "European Sociological Review",
issn = "0266-7215",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

Formal and Informal Social Capital in Germany : The Role of Institutions and Ethnic Diversity. / Levels, Mark; Scheepers, Peer; Huijts, Tim; Kraaykamp, Gerbert.

In: European Sociological Review, Vol. 31, No. 6, 12.2015, p. 766-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Formal and Informal Social Capital in Germany

T2 - The Role of Institutions and Ethnic Diversity

AU - Levels, Mark

AU - Scheepers, Peer

AU - Huijts, Tim

AU - Kraaykamp, Gerbert

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Evidence for the often-posited negative relation between ethnic diversity and various measures of social capital is burdened by difficulties measuring the levels of aggregation at which the indicators operate, the common use of cross-sectional data, and by the common omission of macro-level variables that plausibly confound the relation between ethnic diversity and social capital. To overcome these problems, this article studies social capital in Germany. Germany has a sizeable immigrant population and a considerable within-country variation in the extent to which government institutions and the labour market function. Districts also have different democratic histories. To explore to what extent social capital can be explained by ethnic diversity and institutional characteristics of districts in Germany, we combine data from the German Socioeconomic Panel, with relevant macro-level characteristics at the level of districts (‘Kreise’). We use three-level multilevel regression analyses to study the 2003 data, and individual fixed effects panel regressions to study the consequences of changes between 2003 and 2008. Our findings indicate that ethnic diversity in districts has a negative effect on political participation. We find no evidence that ethnic diversity is related to other forms of social capital.

AB - Evidence for the often-posited negative relation between ethnic diversity and various measures of social capital is burdened by difficulties measuring the levels of aggregation at which the indicators operate, the common use of cross-sectional data, and by the common omission of macro-level variables that plausibly confound the relation between ethnic diversity and social capital. To overcome these problems, this article studies social capital in Germany. Germany has a sizeable immigrant population and a considerable within-country variation in the extent to which government institutions and the labour market function. Districts also have different democratic histories. To explore to what extent social capital can be explained by ethnic diversity and institutional characteristics of districts in Germany, we combine data from the German Socioeconomic Panel, with relevant macro-level characteristics at the level of districts (‘Kreise’). We use three-level multilevel regression analyses to study the 2003 data, and individual fixed effects panel regressions to study the consequences of changes between 2003 and 2008. Our findings indicate that ethnic diversity in districts has a negative effect on political participation. We find no evidence that ethnic diversity is related to other forms of social capital.

KW - MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS

KW - NEIGHBORHOOD DIVERSITY

KW - COHESION

KW - TRUST

KW - PARTICIPATION

KW - COMMUNITY

KW - PUTNAMS

KW - EUROPE

KW - IMPACT

KW - STATE

U2 - 10.1093/esr/jcv075

DO - 10.1093/esr/jcv075

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 766

EP - 779

JO - European Sociological Review

JF - European Sociological Review

SN - 0266-7215

IS - 6

ER -