Abstract
Objectives To assess effectiveness and safety of Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for term induction of labor. Study DesignThis trial randomly allocated women with singleton term pregnancy to 30-mL Foley catheter or 25-g vaginal misoprostol tablets. Primary outcome was cesarean delivery rate. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and time to birth. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted. ResultsFifty-six women were allocated to Foley catheter, 64 to vaginal misoprostol tablets. Cesarean delivery rates did not differ significantly (25% Foley versus 17% misoprostol; relative risk [RR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.94), with more cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress in the Foley group (14% versus 3%; RR 4.57, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.64). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable. Time from induction to birth was longer in the Foley catheter group (36 hours versus 25 hours; p
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-155 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | American Journal of Perinatology |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2014 |
Keywords
- cervical ripening
- labor induction
- Foley catheter
- misoprostol
- prostaglandin E1
- cesarean delivery rate
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROBAAT-M Study) and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver