Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROBAAT-M Study) and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature

Marta Jozwiak*, Mieke ten Eikelder, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Christianne de Groot, Hanneke Feitsma, Marc Spaanderman, Marielle van Pampus, Jan Willem de Leeuw, Ben Willem Mol, Kitty Bloemenkamp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives To assess effectiveness and safety of Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for term induction of labor. Study DesignThis trial randomly allocated women with singleton term pregnancy to 30-mL Foley catheter or 25-g vaginal misoprostol tablets. Primary outcome was cesarean delivery rate. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and time to birth. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted. ResultsFifty-six women were allocated to Foley catheter, 64 to vaginal misoprostol tablets. Cesarean delivery rates did not differ significantly (25% Foley versus 17% misoprostol; relative risk [RR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.94), with more cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress in the Foley group (14% versus 3%; RR 4.57, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.64). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable. Time from induction to birth was longer in the Foley catheter group (36 hours versus 25 hours; p
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-155
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • cervical ripening
  • labor induction
  • Foley catheter
  • misoprostol
  • prostaglandin E1
  • cesarean delivery rate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROBAAT-M Study) and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this