Five pillars for societal perspective

Ruben M. W. A. Drost*, Aggie T. G. Paulus, Silvia M. A. A. Evers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

In economic evaluation, the healthcare perspective has gradually given way to use of the societal perspective, as this perspective is often advocated for support in making optimal societal decisions. In practice, economic evaluations conducted from the societal perspective ignore, fail to measure and/or fail to monetize many of the costs that fall outside of the healthcare sector. To limit bias and increase decision-supportive power, researchers could strengthen their evaluations by adhering to a few basic principles. Five "pillars for the societal perspective" are proposed. First, who bears the cost and who does not is irrelevant. Second, it is imperative to consider including costs for sectors outside the healthcare sector. Third, both high frequent costs and costs with high unit prices should be considered. Fourth, double counting should be avoided. And fifth, researchers should reflect on choices related to costs, i.e. cost omission and problems with identifying, measuring, and valuing costs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number026646232000001
Pages (from-to)72-74
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Economic evaluation
  • Economic analysis
  • Costs
  • Societal perspective
  • Intersectoral costs
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES
  • ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
  • MENTAL-ILLNESS
  • HEALTH
  • CARE

Cite this