TY - JOUR
T1 - Final Whistle in Luxembourg?
T2 - Royal Antwerp as yet Another Reminder of EU law’s Demand for Better Sports Governance
AU - Bellenghi, Guido
AU - Frazao Correia Magalhaes De Carvalho, Mateus
PY - 2024/6/18
Y1 - 2024/6/18
N2 - This contribution analyses the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C680/21, Royal Antwerp. It focuses on the interaction between sports governance and EU law, considering especially free movement rules. Two interconnected aspects are discussed. First, the Court’s clarification on the scope and meaning of Article 165 TFEU, and second, the application of the principle of proportionality in sports cases and beyond. It is argued that the ruling calls for an improvement of sports governance based on the enhancement of its democratic legitimation.
AB - This contribution analyses the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C680/21, Royal Antwerp. It focuses on the interaction between sports governance and EU law, considering especially free movement rules. Two interconnected aspects are discussed. First, the Court’s clarification on the scope and meaning of Article 165 TFEU, and second, the application of the principle of proportionality in sports cases and beyond. It is argued that the ruling calls for an improvement of sports governance based on the enhancement of its democratic legitimation.
UR - http://ShowEdit https://www.aisdue.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Rivista-Quaderni-AISDUE-_compressed.pdf
M3 - Article
SN - 2975-2698
SP - 271
EP - 280
JO - Rivista Quaderni AISDUE
JF - Rivista Quaderni AISDUE
IS - I
ER -