Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the short-term benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, the final long-term survival benefit is as yet unknown.
AIM: To assess the final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolytic therapy in patients over 75 years of age.
METHODS: Patients > 75 years with STEMI were randomised to either primary PCI or thrombolysis. Long-term data on survival were available for all patients.
RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were randomised to primary PCI, 41 to thrombolysis. There were no significant differences in baseline variables. After a maximum of 20 years' follow-up, all patients had passed away. The patients randomised to thrombolysis died after a mean follow-up duration of 5.2 years (SD 4.9) compared to 6.7 years (SD 4.8) in patients randomised to primary PCI (p = 0.15). Thus, the mean final survival benefit of primary PCI was 1.5 years.
CONCLUSION: The final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients with STEMI is 1.5 years and their life expectancy increases by 28.8%.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 567-571 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Netherlands Heart Journal |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 12 |
Early online date | 16 Sept 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |