Feasibility and Effectiveness of Repetitive Gait Training Early After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jonas Schroeder*, Steven Truijen, Tamaya Van Criekinge, Wim Saeys

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Background: Pre-clinical evidence suggests a period early after stroke during which the brain is most receptive to rehabilitation, if it is provided as high-dose motor training.Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of repetitive gait training within the first 3 months post-stroke and the effects on gait-specific outcomes.Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Rehab Data and PEDro databases were searched systematically. Randomized controlled trials were included to descriptively analyse the feasibility and quantitatively investigate the effectiveness of repetitive gait training compared with conventional therapy.Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials were included. Repetitive training can safely be provided through body weight support and locomotor assistance from therapists or a robotic device. No difference in drop-out rates was reported despite the demanding nature of the intervention. The meta-analysis yielded significant, but small, effects on walking independence and endurance. Training with end-effector robots appears most effective.Conclusion: Robots enable a substantial, yet feasible, increase in the quantity of walking practice early post-stroke, which might enhance functional recovery. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects remain poorly understood.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-88
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Exercise therapy
  • Humans
  • Paresis
  • Robotics
  • Stroke
  • Stroke rehabilitation
  • Walking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility and Effectiveness of Repetitive Gait Training Early After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this