Abstract
The risk-balancing hypothesis (RBH) suggests that farms will take less business risk as their
financial risk increases, but existing literature provides empirical evidence that the RBH might
be invalid under certain circumstances. We present a unified model that explains the conditions
under which the RBH holds or is invalidated by recognizing the role of latent heterogeneity among
farms. We generalize the RBH idea and trace the source of credit risk back to latent heterogeneity
among farms. We then apply recent literature to longitudinal data from a panel of Dutch farms
and classify segments using a finite mixture regression fixed-effects model and find that the RBH
may not apply to all groups in the same way.
financial risk increases, but existing literature provides empirical evidence that the RBH might
be invalid under certain circumstances. We present a unified model that explains the conditions
under which the RBH holds or is invalidated by recognizing the role of latent heterogeneity among
farms. We generalize the RBH idea and trace the source of credit risk back to latent heterogeneity
among farms. We then apply recent literature to longitudinal data from a panel of Dutch farms
and classify segments using a finite mixture regression fixed-effects model and find that the RBH
may not apply to all groups in the same way.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 265-281 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2020 |
JEL classifications
- q00 - "Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics: General"
- m00 - "Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting: General"
- g00 - Financial Economics: General
- g02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
Keywords
- farm business
- finite mixture regression fixed-effects model
- risk-balancing hypothesis
- CHOICE
- MARKET
- GROUPED PATTERNS
- PANEL-DATA MODELS