False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts

Ivan Mangiulli*, Fabiana Battista, Nadja Abdel Kafi, Eline Coveliers, Theodore Carlson Webster, Antonietta Curci, Henry Otgaar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

People are often exposed to fake news. Such an exposure to misleading information might lead to false memory creation. We examined whether people can form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news. Furthermore, we investigated which individual factors might predict false memory formation for fake news. In two experiments, we provided participants with two pieces of COVID-19-related fake news along with a non-probative photograph. In Experiment 1, 41% ( n  = 66/161) of our sample reported at least one false memory for COVID-19-related fake news. In Experiment 2, even a higher percentage emerged (54.9%; n  = 185/337). Moreover, in Experiment 2, participants with conspiracy beliefs were more likely to report false memories for fake news than those without such beliefs, irrespective of the conspiratorial nature of the materials. Finally, while well-being was found to be positively associated with both true and false memories (Experiment 1), only analytical thinking was negatively linked to the vulnerability to form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news (Experiment 2). Overall, our data demonstrated that false memories can occur following exposure to fake news about COVID-19, and that governmental and social media interventions are needed to increase individuals' discriminability between true and false COVID-19-related news.

Original languageEnglish
Article number972004
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this