Factors affecting public acceptance of healthy lifestyle nudges

Anastasia Vugts*, Emmy van den Heuvel, Remco C Havermans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In two online vignette studies, we investigated the effects of healthy lifestyle nudging and pricing interventions in two different contexts: a supermarket (Study 1) and a train station (Study 2). In Study 1 (N = 318) participants were randomly assigned to evaluate one of eight interventions described in a vignette and designed to either encourage healthier food choices or discourage unhealthy food choices in a supermarket setting. Two interventions comprised a small financial incentive to either encourage a healthy food choice or discourage an unhealthy food choice, but the other six interventions were nudges conceived to specifically impact agency, self-constitution or freedom of choice (three different aspects of autonomy). Relative to these nudges, the financial incentive interventions were not found to be less acceptable or more patronising. Overall, the encouragement of healthy food choices was rated as more acceptable and less patronising. The same pattern of results was found in Study 2 (N = 314). We conclude that interventions threatening specific aspects of one's autonomy do not necessarily affect its acceptance. However, the behavioural focus does affect intervention acceptance, that is, interventions focused on encouraging healthy choices are considered more acceptable than interventions that discourage the unhealthy option.
Original languageEnglish
Article number116899
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume350
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Behavioural focus
  • Healthy lifestyle interventions
  • Nudges

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors affecting public acceptance of healthy lifestyle nudges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this