Face value: testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition

Nina Tupper, James D Sauer, Melanie Sauerland, Isabel Fu, Lorraine Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The presence of multiple faces during a crime may provide a naturally-occurring contextual cue to support eyewitness recognition for those faces later. Across two experiments, we sought to investigate mechanisms underlying previously-reported cued recognition effects, and to determine whether such effects extended to encoding conditions involving more than two faces. Participants studied sets of individual faces, pairs of faces, or groups of four faces. At test, participants in the single-face condition were tested only on those individual faces without cues. Participants in the two and four-face conditions were tested using no cues, correct cues (a face previously studied with the target test face), or incorrect cues (a never-before-seen face). In Experiment 2, associative encoding was promoted by a rating task. Neither hit rates nor false-alarm rates were significantly affected by cue type or face encoding condition in Experiment 1, but cuing of any kind (correct or incorrect) in Experiment 2 appeared to provide a protective buffer to reduce false-alarm rates through a less liberal response bias. Results provide some evidence that cued recognition techniques could be useful to reduce false recognition, but only when associative encoding is strong.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1436-1449
Number of pages14
JournalMemory
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • METAANALYSIS
  • multiple perpetrators
  • EYEWITNESS MEMORY
  • MODEL
  • IDENTIFICATION
  • associative memory
  • RETRIEVAL
  • ACCURACY
  • VARIABILITY
  • face recognition
  • eyewitness identification
  • Cued recognition

Cite this

Tupper, Nina ; Sauer, James D ; Sauerland, Melanie ; Fu, Isabel ; Hope, Lorraine. / Face value : testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition. In: Memory. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 10. pp. 1436-1449.
@article{22ba719a68a54e0fbc4ccf758eb622d6,
title = "Face value: testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition",
abstract = "The presence of multiple faces during a crime may provide a naturally-occurring contextual cue to support eyewitness recognition for those faces later. Across two experiments, we sought to investigate mechanisms underlying previously-reported cued recognition effects, and to determine whether such effects extended to encoding conditions involving more than two faces. Participants studied sets of individual faces, pairs of faces, or groups of four faces. At test, participants in the single-face condition were tested only on those individual faces without cues. Participants in the two and four-face conditions were tested using no cues, correct cues (a face previously studied with the target test face), or incorrect cues (a never-before-seen face). In Experiment 2, associative encoding was promoted by a rating task. Neither hit rates nor false-alarm rates were significantly affected by cue type or face encoding condition in Experiment 1, but cuing of any kind (correct or incorrect) in Experiment 2 appeared to provide a protective buffer to reduce false-alarm rates through a less liberal response bias. Results provide some evidence that cued recognition techniques could be useful to reduce false recognition, but only when associative encoding is strong.",
keywords = "Journal Article, METAANALYSIS, multiple perpetrators, EYEWITNESS MEMORY, MODEL, IDENTIFICATION, associative memory, RETRIEVAL, ACCURACY, VARIABILITY, face recognition, eyewitness identification, Cued recognition",
author = "Nina Tupper and Sauer, {James D} and Melanie Sauerland and Isabel Fu and Lorraine Hope",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2018.1489968",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1436--1449",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "10",

}

Face value : testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition. / Tupper, Nina; Sauer, James D; Sauerland, Melanie; Fu, Isabel; Hope, Lorraine.

In: Memory, Vol. 26, No. 10, 11.2018, p. 1436-1449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Face value

T2 - testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition

AU - Tupper, Nina

AU - Sauer, James D

AU - Sauerland, Melanie

AU - Fu, Isabel

AU - Hope, Lorraine

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - The presence of multiple faces during a crime may provide a naturally-occurring contextual cue to support eyewitness recognition for those faces later. Across two experiments, we sought to investigate mechanisms underlying previously-reported cued recognition effects, and to determine whether such effects extended to encoding conditions involving more than two faces. Participants studied sets of individual faces, pairs of faces, or groups of four faces. At test, participants in the single-face condition were tested only on those individual faces without cues. Participants in the two and four-face conditions were tested using no cues, correct cues (a face previously studied with the target test face), or incorrect cues (a never-before-seen face). In Experiment 2, associative encoding was promoted by a rating task. Neither hit rates nor false-alarm rates were significantly affected by cue type or face encoding condition in Experiment 1, but cuing of any kind (correct or incorrect) in Experiment 2 appeared to provide a protective buffer to reduce false-alarm rates through a less liberal response bias. Results provide some evidence that cued recognition techniques could be useful to reduce false recognition, but only when associative encoding is strong.

AB - The presence of multiple faces during a crime may provide a naturally-occurring contextual cue to support eyewitness recognition for those faces later. Across two experiments, we sought to investigate mechanisms underlying previously-reported cued recognition effects, and to determine whether such effects extended to encoding conditions involving more than two faces. Participants studied sets of individual faces, pairs of faces, or groups of four faces. At test, participants in the single-face condition were tested only on those individual faces without cues. Participants in the two and four-face conditions were tested using no cues, correct cues (a face previously studied with the target test face), or incorrect cues (a never-before-seen face). In Experiment 2, associative encoding was promoted by a rating task. Neither hit rates nor false-alarm rates were significantly affected by cue type or face encoding condition in Experiment 1, but cuing of any kind (correct or incorrect) in Experiment 2 appeared to provide a protective buffer to reduce false-alarm rates through a less liberal response bias. Results provide some evidence that cued recognition techniques could be useful to reduce false recognition, but only when associative encoding is strong.

KW - Journal Article

KW - METAANALYSIS

KW - multiple perpetrators

KW - EYEWITNESS MEMORY

KW - MODEL

KW - IDENTIFICATION

KW - associative memory

KW - RETRIEVAL

KW - ACCURACY

KW - VARIABILITY

KW - face recognition

KW - eyewitness identification

KW - Cued recognition

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2018.1489968

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2018.1489968

M3 - Article

C2 - 29932823

VL - 26

SP - 1436

EP - 1449

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 10

ER -