Research output per year
Research output per year
Kenneth Holmqvist*, Saga Lee Örbom, Ignace T C Hooge, Diederick C Niehorster, Robert G Alexander, Richard Andersson, Jeroen S Benjamins, Pieter Blignaut, Anne-Marie Brouwer, Lewis L Chuang, Kirsten A Dalrymple, Denis Drieghe, Matt J Dunn, Ulrich Ettinger, Susann Fiedler, Tom Foulsham, Jos N van der Geest, Dan Witzner Hansen, Samuel B Hutton, Enkelejda Kasneci
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 364-416 |
Number of pages | 53 |
Journal | Behavior Research Methods |
Volume | 55 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 6 Apr 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Erratum / corrigendum / retractions › Academic