Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest

Alexander Supady*, Jan Belohlávek, Alain Combes, Alice Hutin, Roberto Lorusso, Graeme MacLaren, Ingrid Magnet, Marcel van de Poll, Susanna Price, Dawid L. Staudacher, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Demetri Yannopoulos, Daniel Brodie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review articlepeer-review

Abstract

When conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) cannot restore spontaneous circulation, the initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during refractory cardiac arrest—known as extracorporeal CPR (ECPR)—might restore circulation and adequate tissue oxygenation. ECPR could substantially improve survival with favourable functional recovery. However, the complexity and time-sensitive nature of the intervention, high costs, resource demands, considerable risks, and complications restrict the availability of ECPR. Patient age and comorbidities, timely and effective CCPR, and time-to-ECPR are major contributors to the outcome of patients. The primary goal of ECPR is full recovery of the patient, but in some cases, transition to a long-term ventricular assist device or heart transplantation can be additional options for survival. In patients diagnosed with brain death or, according to local regulation, in those with irreversible post-anoxic brain damage, organ donation is possible after ECPR. Ongoing research aims to assess the efficacy of ECPR versus continued CCPR and uncover key prognostic indicators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)843-856
Number of pages14
JournalThe Lancet Respiratory medicine
Volume13
Issue number9
Early online date1 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this