External electrical cardioversion in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Is it safe and is immediate device interrogation necessary?

Nikki A. H. A. Pluymaekers*, Elton A. M. P. Dudink, Lucas Boersma, Omer Erkuner, Marloes Gelissen, Vincent van Dijk, Maurits Wijffels, Dinh Dinh, Kevin Vernooy, Harry J. G. M. Crijns, Jippe Balt, Justin G. L. M. Luermans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

BackgroundAtrial tachyarrhythmias are common in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Restoration of sinus rhythm by external electrical cardioversion (eECV) is frequently used to alleviate symptoms and to ensure optimal device function. ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety of eECV in patients with contemporary CIEDs and to assess the need for immediate device interrogation after eECV. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 229 patients (27.9% female, age 6910 years) with a CIED (104 pacemakers, 69 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 56 biventricular devices) who underwent eECV between 2008 and 2016 in two centers. Data from device interrogation before eECV, immediately afterwards, and at first follow-up (FU) after eECV were collected. CIED-related complications and adverse events during and after eECV were recorded. ResultsNo significant differences between right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) sensing or threshold values before eECV, immediately afterwards, or at FU were observed. A small yet significant decrease was observed in RA and RV impedance immediately after eECV (484 vs 462, P<0.001 and 536 vs 514, P<0.001, respectively). The RV impedance did not recover to the baseline value (538 vs 527 , P=0.02). The impedance changes were without clinical consequences. No changes in left ventricular lead threshold or impedance values were measured. No CIED-related complications or adverse events were documented following eECV. ConclusioneECV in patients with contemporary CIEDs is safe. There seems to be no need for immediate device interrogation after eECV.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1336-1340
Number of pages5
JournalPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume41
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • CIED
  • external ECV
  • immediate device interrogation
  • safety
  • ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
  • PACING SYSTEMS
  • PACEMAKER
  • DEFIBRILLATION

Cite this