Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

Studying class stigma in the context of diabetes and socioeconomic inequalities may shed light on the societal factors influencing diabetes. Data from 1947 participants aged 49-88 who participated in the second phase of The Maastricht Study were used. SEP (education, income, occupation) and a six-item classism scale were measured through self-reported questionnaires. Prediabetes and T2D were defined through an oral glucose tolerance test. We conducted multinomial logistic regression analyses to investigate the associations between SEP, classism, and diabetes. About 20.9% (N = 406) of the study sample had T2D (Meanage = 69.8 +/- 6.8; 31.3% women). People with low SEP had T2D (e.g. income OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.54-2.82) and reported perceived classism (e.g. education OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.33-3.21) more often than people with high SEP. Classism was not statistically significantly associated with T2D. Social health inequalities are apparent in T2D; however, our results suggest that class stigma might not be a major factor in the underlying processes. Further research should investigate chronic stress and the intersection of stigmas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3578-3588
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume31
Issue number9
Early online date13 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • classism
  • socioeconomic inequalities
  • stigma
  • type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the role of class stigma in socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this