Exploring the process when developing a lifestyle intervention in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal process evaluation

J.J. Linmans, C. van Rossem, J.A. Knottnerus, M. Spigt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A thorough understanding of the processes involved in lifestyle interventions is needed in order to close the gap between research and daily practice. This study explored the processes involved in the provision of a lifestyle intervention to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by health care professionals in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: Health care professionals were asked to intensify lifestyle interventions for patients with T2DM in a routine care setting. Data were collected by serial interviews with health care professionals and patients, recorded consultations, an activity questionnaire and biomedical information. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework analysis with a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: The lifestyle intervention developed by the health care professionals included motivational interviewing, a nutrition and physical activity diary, and a multidisciplinary approach [physiotherapist, dietician, general practitioner and diabetes practice nurse (DPN)]. Participants and health care professionals were positive about the intervention, and patients were more active (P = 0.027), lost weight (P = 0.031) and had lower levels of glycated haemoglobin (P = 0.012). However, qualitative data showed that patients were passive during the consultation, and did not ask questions about ways to improve their lifestyle. DPNs did not use motivational interviewing optimally; provided patients with information that was difficult to understand; and were easily satisfied with the efforts of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention for patients with T2DM is difficult in routine primary care. DPNs should adapt to the knowledge level of the patients, and patients must be stimulated to take an active role in their treatment. Patients and health care professionals should become equal partners in determining mutually agreeable treatment plans and goals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-59
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health
Volume129
Issue number1
Early online date24 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • Public health practice
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Quality improvement
  • Process assessment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health communication
  • WORLD PRIMARY-CARE
  • PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY
  • QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS
  • UNDERSTAND PATIENTS
  • MELLITUS
  • PEOPLE
  • EXPERIENCES
  • MANAGEMENT
  • NUTRITION
  • PATIENT

Cite this

@article{a348123d748b40569462049a40841378,
title = "Exploring the process when developing a lifestyle intervention in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal process evaluation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: A thorough understanding of the processes involved in lifestyle interventions is needed in order to close the gap between research and daily practice. This study explored the processes involved in the provision of a lifestyle intervention to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by health care professionals in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: Health care professionals were asked to intensify lifestyle interventions for patients with T2DM in a routine care setting. Data were collected by serial interviews with health care professionals and patients, recorded consultations, an activity questionnaire and biomedical information. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework analysis with a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: The lifestyle intervention developed by the health care professionals included motivational interviewing, a nutrition and physical activity diary, and a multidisciplinary approach [physiotherapist, dietician, general practitioner and diabetes practice nurse (DPN)]. Participants and health care professionals were positive about the intervention, and patients were more active (P = 0.027), lost weight (P = 0.031) and had lower levels of glycated haemoglobin (P = 0.012). However, qualitative data showed that patients were passive during the consultation, and did not ask questions about ways to improve their lifestyle. DPNs did not use motivational interviewing optimally; provided patients with information that was difficult to understand; and were easily satisfied with the efforts of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention for patients with T2DM is difficult in routine primary care. DPNs should adapt to the knowledge level of the patients, and patients must be stimulated to take an active role in their treatment. Patients and health care professionals should become equal partners in determining mutually agreeable treatment plans and goals.",
keywords = "Public health practice, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Quality improvement, Process assessment, Lifestyle, Health communication, WORLD PRIMARY-CARE, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS, UNDERSTAND PATIENTS, MELLITUS, PEOPLE, EXPERIENCES, MANAGEMENT, NUTRITION, PATIENT",
author = "J.J. Linmans and {van Rossem}, C. and J.A. Knottnerus and M. Spigt",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2014.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "52--59",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier Saunders",
number = "1",

}

Exploring the process when developing a lifestyle intervention in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal process evaluation. / Linmans, J.J.; van Rossem, C.; Knottnerus, J.A.; Spigt, M.

In: Public Health, Vol. 129, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 52-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the process when developing a lifestyle intervention in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal process evaluation

AU - Linmans, J.J.

AU - van Rossem, C.

AU - Knottnerus, J.A.

AU - Spigt, M.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: A thorough understanding of the processes involved in lifestyle interventions is needed in order to close the gap between research and daily practice. This study explored the processes involved in the provision of a lifestyle intervention to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by health care professionals in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: Health care professionals were asked to intensify lifestyle interventions for patients with T2DM in a routine care setting. Data were collected by serial interviews with health care professionals and patients, recorded consultations, an activity questionnaire and biomedical information. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework analysis with a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: The lifestyle intervention developed by the health care professionals included motivational interviewing, a nutrition and physical activity diary, and a multidisciplinary approach [physiotherapist, dietician, general practitioner and diabetes practice nurse (DPN)]. Participants and health care professionals were positive about the intervention, and patients were more active (P = 0.027), lost weight (P = 0.031) and had lower levels of glycated haemoglobin (P = 0.012). However, qualitative data showed that patients were passive during the consultation, and did not ask questions about ways to improve their lifestyle. DPNs did not use motivational interviewing optimally; provided patients with information that was difficult to understand; and were easily satisfied with the efforts of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention for patients with T2DM is difficult in routine primary care. DPNs should adapt to the knowledge level of the patients, and patients must be stimulated to take an active role in their treatment. Patients and health care professionals should become equal partners in determining mutually agreeable treatment plans and goals.

AB - OBJECTIVES: A thorough understanding of the processes involved in lifestyle interventions is needed in order to close the gap between research and daily practice. This study explored the processes involved in the provision of a lifestyle intervention to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by health care professionals in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: Health care professionals were asked to intensify lifestyle interventions for patients with T2DM in a routine care setting. Data were collected by serial interviews with health care professionals and patients, recorded consultations, an activity questionnaire and biomedical information. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework analysis with a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: The lifestyle intervention developed by the health care professionals included motivational interviewing, a nutrition and physical activity diary, and a multidisciplinary approach [physiotherapist, dietician, general practitioner and diabetes practice nurse (DPN)]. Participants and health care professionals were positive about the intervention, and patients were more active (P = 0.027), lost weight (P = 0.031) and had lower levels of glycated haemoglobin (P = 0.012). However, qualitative data showed that patients were passive during the consultation, and did not ask questions about ways to improve their lifestyle. DPNs did not use motivational interviewing optimally; provided patients with information that was difficult to understand; and were easily satisfied with the efforts of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention for patients with T2DM is difficult in routine primary care. DPNs should adapt to the knowledge level of the patients, and patients must be stimulated to take an active role in their treatment. Patients and health care professionals should become equal partners in determining mutually agreeable treatment plans and goals.

KW - Public health practice

KW - Type 2 diabetes mellitus

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Process assessment

KW - Lifestyle

KW - Health communication

KW - WORLD PRIMARY-CARE

KW - PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY

KW - QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS

KW - UNDERSTAND PATIENTS

KW - MELLITUS

KW - PEOPLE

KW - EXPERIENCES

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - NUTRITION

KW - PATIENT

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.11.004

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 52

EP - 59

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

IS - 1

ER -