Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring the gap between sensor-detected (SDH) and person-reported hypoglycaemia (PRH): The voice of people living with diabetes

  • Monika Cigler
  • , Omaima El-Hakouni
  • , Renald Mecani
  • , Francois Pouwer
  • , Evertine J. Abbink
  • , Michaela Moser
  • , Bastiaan E. de Galan
  • , Eric Renard
  • , Mark Evans
  • , Julie Maria Boggild Brosen
  • , Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard
  • , Rory J. McCrimmon
  • , Simon Heller
  • , Petra M. Baumann
  • , Uffe Soholm
  • , Silvia Basta
  • , Patrick Divilly
  • , Natalie Zaremba
  • , Stephanie A. Amiel
  • , Pratik Choudhary
  • Julia K. Mader*, Hypo-RESOLVE Consortium
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background and Aims: In people with insulin-treated diabetes experiencing hypoglycaemia, the multicentre Hypo-METRICS study found that 60% of sensor-detected hypoglycaemic episodes (SDH) were asymptomatic, and over 40% of person-reported hypoglycaemia (PRH) occurred at glucose levels ≥70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). This subanalysis explored participants' experiences of these episodes to identify possible clinical implications. Methods: Fifty-eight Austrian participants received a 15-item questionnaire on their experience of asymptomatic hypoglycaemia and symptoms at glucose levels ≥70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Results: The response rate was 86% (n = 50). Among all participants, 56% (n = 28) reported experiencing hypoglycaemic symptoms at glucose levels ≥70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) “sometimes” or “often.” They attributed this to a combination of a threshold shift due to chronic hyperglycaemia, rapid glucose decline and fear of hypoglycaemia. 68% of all SDH < 70 mg/dL and 59% of those below the clinically critical level of 54 mg/dL were asymptomatic. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that SDH and PRH each capture different, yet equally important, dimensions of the hypoglycaemia experience. Relying on only one source of information inevitably provides an incomplete picture. By integrating the patient's voice, diabetes professionals can provide appropriate support and tailor continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) alarm settings and treatment plans to truly meet individual needs.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70301
Number of pages10
JournalDiabetic Medicine
Volume43
Issue number8
Early online date1 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • continuous blood glucose monitoring
  • diabetes
  • patient experience
  • type 1 diabetes
  • type 2 diabetes
  • GLUCOSE-SENSING TECHNOLOGY
  • TYPE-1
  • FREQUENCY
  • ADULTS
  • MULTICENTER
  • RESPONSES
  • SYMPTOMS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the gap between sensor-detected (SDH) and person-reported hypoglycaemia (PRH): The voice of people living with diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this