TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring patient involvement and influencing factors in digital interdisciplinary consultation
AU - Peeters, Ken MM
AU - Hidding, Carmen Y.
AU - Buist, Petra
AU - Sanavro, Sanne M.
AU - van der Lugt, Dennis
AU - Stoffelen, Joke
AU - Blanker, Marco H.
AU - van der Worp, Henk
AU - Schers, Henk J.
AU - Giroldi, Esther
AU - Cals, Jochen WL
AU - Jansen, Jesse
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by ZonMw (project number 10060022010001) and is part of the project \u2018Digital interdisciplinary consultation in Dutch primary care\u2019, which is part of the program \u2018Knowledge program Primary Care: complex questions 2020\u2019. The project is a collaboration between the departments of Primary Care of the Universities of Groningen, Nijmegen and Maastricht, which are all members of the Dutch Primary Care Research Consortium.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Objectives: We explored patient attitudes and experiences around their involvement throughout the digital interdisciplinary consultation (DICO) process and identified its influencing factors. DICO is defined as asynchronous, targeted communication between GPs and hospital specialists via a secure electronic application where patient-specific information is shared, and clarification or guidance is sought concerning a clinical question. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in the Netherlands. A conceptual framework was iteratively developed to identify phases of DICO where patient involvement is possible, drawing on literature research and expert meetings. Data from three interrelated studies performing semi-structured interviews regarding patients' experiences with various types of DICO were triangulated. The conceptual framework was expanded with factors influencing the degree of patient involvement at each phase, based on the findings from the patient interviews. Results: We analyzed 27 patient interviews. Patients viewed DICO as an initial step in care, with limited active involvement required. From the perspective of the patient, the decision to initiate DICO is typically made by the GP, often without patient input. GPs initiate DICO for various reasons and patient involvement varies depending on the reason. Key factors influencing involvement as perceived by patients include the GP-patient relationship, particularly trust, the nature of the medical problem (e.g., urgency and severity), and patients’ needs and preferences. Patients appreciated post-DICO discussions, particularly in cases of uncertainty, and considered shared decision making important when DICO leads to health decisions. Conclusions: The study highlights how the level of patient involvement in DICO varies depending on the reason for initiating DICO, the nature of the medical problem, patients’ needs and preferences, and the GP-patient relationship. Practice implications: Findings from this study show patient involvement in DICO is context-dependent; GPs should tailor involvement across multiple DICO phases, especially when providing feedback on the outcome of DICO. Findings can contribute to future guidelines for effective, patient-centered DICO implementation.
AB - Objectives: We explored patient attitudes and experiences around their involvement throughout the digital interdisciplinary consultation (DICO) process and identified its influencing factors. DICO is defined as asynchronous, targeted communication between GPs and hospital specialists via a secure electronic application where patient-specific information is shared, and clarification or guidance is sought concerning a clinical question. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in the Netherlands. A conceptual framework was iteratively developed to identify phases of DICO where patient involvement is possible, drawing on literature research and expert meetings. Data from three interrelated studies performing semi-structured interviews regarding patients' experiences with various types of DICO were triangulated. The conceptual framework was expanded with factors influencing the degree of patient involvement at each phase, based on the findings from the patient interviews. Results: We analyzed 27 patient interviews. Patients viewed DICO as an initial step in care, with limited active involvement required. From the perspective of the patient, the decision to initiate DICO is typically made by the GP, often without patient input. GPs initiate DICO for various reasons and patient involvement varies depending on the reason. Key factors influencing involvement as perceived by patients include the GP-patient relationship, particularly trust, the nature of the medical problem (e.g., urgency and severity), and patients’ needs and preferences. Patients appreciated post-DICO discussions, particularly in cases of uncertainty, and considered shared decision making important when DICO leads to health decisions. Conclusions: The study highlights how the level of patient involvement in DICO varies depending on the reason for initiating DICO, the nature of the medical problem, patients’ needs and preferences, and the GP-patient relationship. Practice implications: Findings from this study show patient involvement in DICO is context-dependent; GPs should tailor involvement across multiple DICO phases, especially when providing feedback on the outcome of DICO. Findings can contribute to future guidelines for effective, patient-centered DICO implementation.
KW - Digital consultation
KW - Digital interdisciplinary consultation
KW - Digital interprofessional communication
KW - E-consultation
KW - Electronic consultation
KW - Family medicine
KW - General practice
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109360
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109360
M3 - Article
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 142
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
M1 - 109360
ER -