Abstract
There is currently no empirical evidence on whether or not the use of childlike sex dolls would prevent or encourage sexual abuse of children. Yet, more and more countries prohibit or contemplate prohibiting these objects, and the EU Commission also announced it would consider this issue in the context of the fight against child sexual abuse. This article describes and compares the laws and policies of five countries in which childlike sex dolls are currently banned: Australia, Germany, Denmark, Norway and the UK. These countries have adopted different approaches to dealing with the newly emerging phenomenon of childlike sex dolls: While in Australia, Germany and Denmark dedicated laws prohibiting these dolls are introduced, in Norway and the UK existing laws are applied to these objects. By juxtaposing and critically assessing the different approaches to prohibiting childlike sex dolls, the article aims to inspire and guide other countries that also contemplate legislative action in this context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 63-82 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2023 |
Keywords
- childlike sex dolls
- sexual abuse of children
- protection of children
- morals
- obscene and indecent articles
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring different national approaches to prohibiting childlike sex dolls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver