Explaining the Legal Effects of Recognition

Jure Vidmar*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Abstract Recognition in contemporary international law is generally seen as a declaratory act. This is indeed the only plausible explanation in situations where a new State emerges consensually and in the absence of territorial illegality. Unilateral secession and territorial illegality, however, create different legal circumstances in which the applicable rules of international law imply and even presuppose that (collective) recognition could have constitutive effects. This article therefore suggests that the interpretation of the legal nature of recognition and non-recognition should not start on the premise that recognition always merely acknowledges the fact of the emergence of a new State. This is not to say that States cannot exist without being recognized. Rather, the legal effects of recognition may depend on the mode of a certain (attempt at) State creation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-387
JournalInternational and comparative law quarterly
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining the Legal Effects of Recognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this