Explaining socio-economic differences in intention to smoke among primary school children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Smoking prevalence is higher among low socio-economic status (LSES) groups, and this difference may originate from a higher intention to smoke in childhood. This study aims to identify factors that explain differences in intention to smoke between children living in high socio-economic status (HSES) and LSES neighbourhoods.

Methods: Cross-sectional data were derived from the baseline assessment of a smoking prevention intervention study. Dutch primary school children, aged 10 - 11 years (N = 2,612), completed a web-based questionnaire about their attitude, subjective norm, self-efficacy expectations, modelling and intention to smoke. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess potential individual cognitive (attitude, subjective norm and self-efficacy) and social environmental (modelling) mediators between SES and intention to smoke.

Results: Multiple mediation models indicated that modelling mediated the association between SES (B = -0.09 (p <0.01)) and intention to smoke (B = 1.06 (p <0.01)). Mainly the father, mother and other family members mediated this association. Gender did not moderate the association between SES and intention to smoke and the potential mediators indicating that there are no differences in mediating factors between boys and girls.

Conclusions: This study indicates that future smoking prevention studies may focus on the social environment to prevent smoking onset. However, replication of this study is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Article number191
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Socio-economic status
  • Intention to smoke
  • Primary school
  • Mediation analyses
  • SOCIAL INFLUENCES
  • PLANNED BEHAVIOR
  • SELF-EFFICACY
  • PREDICTORS
  • HEALTH
  • ADOLESCENTS
  • PREVENTION
  • INITIATION
  • PARENTS
  • IMPACT

Cite this