Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Maastricht University
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Dataset/Software
Projects
Expected Utility and Political Decision Making
Jona Linde
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Microeconomics & Public Economics
Research output
:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
›
Chapter
›
Academic
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Expected Utility and Political Decision Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Expected Utility Theory
100%
Political Decision-making
100%
Expected Utility
100%
Median Voter Theorem
25%
Empirical Phenomena
25%
Politicians
12%
Policy Making
12%
Prospect Theory
12%
Modeling Techniques
12%
Data Required
12%
Thinking Styles
12%
Spatial Voting
12%
Expected Utility Model
12%
Political Decisions
12%
Policy-seeking
12%
Campaign Promises
12%
Behavior Uncertainty
12%
Pivotal Voting
12%
Modern Theory
12%
Vote Buying
12%
Utility Framework
12%
Model Decision
12%
Political Actors
12%
INIS
decision making
100%
utilities
100%
range
16%
data
8%
values
8%
applications
8%
policy
8%
failures
8%
modeling
8%
hypothesis
8%
host
8%
Social Sciences
Political Decision Making
100%
Utility Theory
100%
Decision Model
12%
Political Decision
12%
Political Actor
12%
Prospect Theory
12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Expected Utility Theory
100%
Median Voter
25%
Prospect Theory
12%