Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning

Ali Modabber; Florian Peters; Kristian Kniha; Evgeny Goloborodko; Alireza Ghassemi; Bernd Lethaus; Frank Hoelzle; Stephan Christian Moehlhenrich

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.008

Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning

Ali Modabber^*, Florian Peters, Kristian Kniha, Evgeny Goloborodko, Alireza Ghassemi, Bernd Lethaus, Frank Hoelzle, Stephan Christian Moehlhenrich

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

55 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Numerous three-dimensional (3D) facial scanners have emerged on the market; however, publications evaluating their accuracies are sparse. In this study, the accuracy of two 3D scanners used in facial scanning was evaluated.A test specimen was attached at the right cheek and the forehead of 41 volunteers. These volunteers were scanned with Artec EVA? and FaceScan3D?. The acquired data were aligned to a 3D model of the test specimen for comparing the mean error, original length and width and angles to the measured values.The mean error in Best Fit alignment is significantly lower using Artec EVA (p?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1719-1724
Journal	Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume	44
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.008
Publication status	Published - Oct 2016

Keywords

3D-scanner
Accuracy
Artec EVA
FaceScan3D

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.008

Cite this

@article{9c710adc5a00498b9056120950c9d170,

title = "Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning",

abstract = "Numerous three-dimensional (3D) facial scanners have emerged on the market; however, publications evaluating their accuracies are sparse. In this study, the accuracy of two 3D scanners used in facial scanning was evaluated.A test specimen was attached at the right cheek and the forehead of 41 volunteers. These volunteers were scanned with Artec EVA? and FaceScan3D?. The acquired data were aligned to a 3D model of the test specimen for comparing the mean error, original length and width and angles to the measured values.The mean error in Best Fit alignment is significantly lower using Artec EVA (p?",

keywords = "3D-scanner, Accuracy, Artec EVA, FaceScan3D",

author = "Ali Modabber and Florian Peters and Kristian Kniha and Evgeny Goloborodko and Alireza Ghassemi and Bernd Lethaus and Frank Hoelzle and Moehlhenrich, {Stephan Christian}",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.008",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "1719--1724",

journal = "Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery",

issn = "1010-5182",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning

AU - Modabber, Ali

AU - Peters, Florian

AU - Kniha, Kristian

AU - Goloborodko, Evgeny

AU - Ghassemi, Alireza

AU - Lethaus, Bernd

AU - Hoelzle, Frank

AU - Moehlhenrich, Stephan Christian

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - Numerous three-dimensional (3D) facial scanners have emerged on the market; however, publications evaluating their accuracies are sparse. In this study, the accuracy of two 3D scanners used in facial scanning was evaluated.A test specimen was attached at the right cheek and the forehead of 41 volunteers. These volunteers were scanned with Artec EVA? and FaceScan3D?. The acquired data were aligned to a 3D model of the test specimen for comparing the mean error, original length and width and angles to the measured values.The mean error in Best Fit alignment is significantly lower using Artec EVA (p?

AB - Numerous three-dimensional (3D) facial scanners have emerged on the market; however, publications evaluating their accuracies are sparse. In this study, the accuracy of two 3D scanners used in facial scanning was evaluated.A test specimen was attached at the right cheek and the forehead of 41 volunteers. These volunteers were scanned with Artec EVA? and FaceScan3D?. The acquired data were aligned to a 3D model of the test specimen for comparing the mean error, original length and width and angles to the measured values.The mean error in Best Fit alignment is significantly lower using Artec EVA (p?

KW - 3D-scanner

KW - Accuracy

KW - Artec EVA

KW - FaceScan3D

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 27614543

VL - 44

SP - 1719

EP - 1724

JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 1010-5182

IS - 10

ER -