Evaluating carotid and aortic peak velocity variation as an alternative index for stroke volume and pulse pressure variation: a method comparison study

  • Joris van Houte*
  • , Esmee C. de Boer
  • , Luuk van Knippenberg
  • , Irene Suriani
  • , Michael I. Meesters
  • , Loek P. B. Meijs
  • , Leon J. Montenij
  • , Arthur R. Bouwman
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The peak velocity variation within the carotid artery ( VpeakCCA) and left ventricular outflow tract ( VpeakLVOT) is derived from the pulsed wave Doppler waveform and may predict fluid responsiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate VpeakCCA and VpeakLVOT against calibrated stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PVV). Therefore, eighteen cardiac surgery patients were included in this prospective observational study. Doppler measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia, after a passive leg raise, and at the end of surgery. Simultaneously, SVV and PPV were measured by pulse-contour-analysis (PiCCO). The correlation, methodological agreement, concordance, and clinical agreement between Doppler and PiCCO measurements were assessed. The correlation between SVV and VpeakCCA was strong (p = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias of 0.01%, and LOA +/- 4.6%, acceptable concordance (93%), and close to acceptable clinical agreement (88%). For PPV and VpeakCCA correlation was also strong (p = 0.73), bias was -0.2%, LOA +/- 7.6%, with intermediate acceptable concordance (90%), and low clinical agreement (72%). Analysis of VpeakLVOT measurements demonstrated poor statistical agreement with SVV and PPV. In conclusion, in cardiac surgery patients VpeakCCA, as opposed to VpeakLVOT, has acceptable statistical and clinical agreement with SVV measurements. VpeakCCA may qualify as a potential tool for non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100001
Number of pages9
JournalWFUMB Ultrasound Open
Volume1
Issue number1
Early online date1 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Peak velocity variation
  • Carotid Doppler ultrasound
  • Stroke volume variation
  • Pulse pressure variation
  • Left ventricular outflow tract
  • Passive leg raise
  • Fluid responsiveness
  • Point of care ultrasound (POCUS)
  • FLUID RESPONSIVENESS
  • CARDIAC-OUTPUT
  • VENTILATED PATIENTS
  • DOPPLER
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • RESUSCITATION
  • MONITORS
  • TIME

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating carotid and aortic peak velocity variation as an alternative index for stroke volume and pulse pressure variation: a method comparison study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this