EULAR points to consider for therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

Charlotte Lm Krieckaert, Astrid van Tubergen, Johanna Elin Gehin, Borja Hernández-Breijo, Guillaume Le Mélédo, Alejandro Balsa, Peter Böhm, Sasa Cucnik, Ori Elkayam, Guro L Goll, Femke Hooijberg, Meghna Jani, Patrick Dw Kiely, Neil McCarthy, Denis Mulleman, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Katherine Payne, Martin E Perry, Chamaida Plasencia-Rodriguez, Simon R StonesSilje Watterdal Syversen, Annick de Vries, Katherine M Ward, Gertjan Wolbink, John D Isaacs*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop EULAR points-to-consider for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

METHODS: The points-to-consider were developed in accordance with EULAR standardised operation procedures by a multidisciplinary task force from eight European countries, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Level of evidence and strength of the points-to-consider were determined, and mean levels of agreement among the task force were calculated using a 10-point rating scale.

RESULTS: Six overarching principles and 13 points-to-consider were formulated. The level of agreement among the task force for the overarching principles and points-to-consider ranged from 8.4 to 9.9.The overarching principles define TDM and its subtypes, and reinforce the underlying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles, which are relevant to all biopharmaceutical classes. The points-to-consider highlight the clinical utility of the measurement and interpretation of biopharmaceutical blood concentrations and antidrug antibodies in specific clinical scenarios, including factors that influence these parameters. In general, proactive use of TDM is not recommended but reactive TDM could be considered in certain clinical situations. An important factor limiting wider adoption of TDM is the lack of both high quality trials addressing effectiveness and safety of TDM and robust economic evaluation in patients with RMDs. Future research should focus on providing this evidence, as well as on further understanding of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of biopharmaceuticals.

CONCLUSION: These points-to-consider are evidence-based and consensus-based statements for the use of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory RMDs, addressing the clinical utility of TDM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-73
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume82
Issue number1
Early online date11 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Keywords

  • ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS
  • ANTI-ADALIMUMAB ANTIBODIES
  • ARTHRITIS PATIENTS
  • Ankylosing
  • Arthritis
  • Biological Therapy
  • CLINICAL-RESPONSE
  • INFLIXIMAB TROUGH LEVELS
  • LONG-TERM TREATMENT
  • OF-CARE
  • OPEN-LABEL
  • PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Psoriatic
  • Rheumatoid
  • SERUM-LEVELS
  • Spondylitis

Cite this