EU external representation in conflict resolution: When does the Presidency or the High Representative speak for Europe?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Who speaks for Europe is a major question in European integration, yet few systematic attempts have been made to study when the Presidency or the High Representative represents the European Union. This article uses two most-similar cases of conflict resolution with significant EU involvement to argue that the size of the Presidency matters. Large member states have more diplomatic resources and political experience. They were therefore less inclined to rely on the High Representative and his/her staff. The High Representative, on the other hand, had greater difficulties to compete with large member states for media attention and for third party recognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Integration online Papers-EIoP
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • CFSP
  • international relations
  • political representation
  • political science
  • security/external

Cite this

@article{3473c609f44346d6957adfee3fec4cfd,
title = "EU external representation in conflict resolution: When does the Presidency or the High Representative speak for Europe?",
abstract = "Who speaks for Europe is a major question in European integration, yet few systematic attempts have been made to study when the Presidency or the High Representative represents the European Union. This article uses two most-similar cases of conflict resolution with significant EU involvement to argue that the size of the Presidency matters. Large member states have more diplomatic resources and political experience. They were therefore less inclined to rely on the High Representative and his/her staff. The High Representative, on the other hand, had greater difficulties to compete with large member states for media attention and for third party recognition.",
keywords = "CFSP, international relations, political representation, political science, security/external",
author = "H. Dijkstra",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1695/2011001",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "European Integration online Papers-EIoP",
issn = "1027-5193",
publisher = "Austrian Academy of Sciences",
number = "1",

}

EU external representation in conflict resolution: When does the Presidency or the High Representative speak for Europe? / Dijkstra, H.

In: European Integration online Papers-EIoP, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - EU external representation in conflict resolution: When does the Presidency or the High Representative speak for Europe?

AU - Dijkstra, H.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Who speaks for Europe is a major question in European integration, yet few systematic attempts have been made to study when the Presidency or the High Representative represents the European Union. This article uses two most-similar cases of conflict resolution with significant EU involvement to argue that the size of the Presidency matters. Large member states have more diplomatic resources and political experience. They were therefore less inclined to rely on the High Representative and his/her staff. The High Representative, on the other hand, had greater difficulties to compete with large member states for media attention and for third party recognition.

AB - Who speaks for Europe is a major question in European integration, yet few systematic attempts have been made to study when the Presidency or the High Representative represents the European Union. This article uses two most-similar cases of conflict resolution with significant EU involvement to argue that the size of the Presidency matters. Large member states have more diplomatic resources and political experience. They were therefore less inclined to rely on the High Representative and his/her staff. The High Representative, on the other hand, had greater difficulties to compete with large member states for media attention and for third party recognition.

KW - CFSP

KW - international relations

KW - political representation

KW - political science

KW - security/external

U2 - 10.1695/2011001

DO - 10.1695/2011001

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - European Integration online Papers-EIoP

JF - European Integration online Papers-EIoP

SN - 1027-5193

IS - 1

ER -