Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethical Implications of Onlife Vitriol

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

This chapter explores onlife vitriol from an ethical perspective. Traditional offline/online dualisms hinder in-depth understanding because online and offline violence are deeply interconnected, hence onlife. We discuss three cases of onlife vitriol: revenge rape and slut shaming, body shaming, and cyberbullying. Onlife vitriol opens up unprecedented forms of harm enabled, and often amplified, by the technology. We argue that this form of violence is currently inadequately addressed. Existing legal measures are not (yet) effective for preventing or ensuring sufficient reparation in cases of onlife vitriol. Societal debates about how to handle onlife vitriol lag behind despite implicit acknowledgement of its harmful effects. Greater media literacy and more research concerning the boundaries of monitoring are needed now that it has become increasingly easy to surveil, coveil, and sousveil.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationViolence and Trolling on Social Media
Subtitle of host publicationHistory, Affect, and Effects of Online Vitriol
EditorsS. A. Polak, D. Trottier
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherAmsterdam University Press
Chapter9
Pages197-214
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781003709114
ISBN (Print)9789462989481
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

SeriesMediaMatters

Keywords

  • Coveillance
  • Onlife vitriol
  • Online vitriol
  • Sousveillance
  • Surveillance
  • Violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical Implications of Onlife Vitriol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this