Erratum to: Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures: an Explorative Study Among Western and Non-Western Experts (vol 10, pg 274, 2017)

Irena Boskovic*, Douwe van der Heide, Lorraine Hope, Harald Merckelbach, Marko Jelicic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalErratum / corrigendum / retractionsAcademic

Abstract

Correction of mistake in the original version of this paper, “Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures: an Explorative Study Among Western and Non- Western Experts”, the sentence “We conducted a 2 (Western vs non-Western) × 3 (SIMS versus DES-T-versus BSI-18 items) analysis of variance (ANOVA).” should read “We conducted a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), where dependent variables were the plausibility scores on SIMS, DES-T, and BSI-18, and the independent variable was culture background of professionals (Western vs non-Western).” The footnote “We also ran this ANOVA with working experience as a covariate, and none of the results reached significance: λ = .97, F(3.89) = .98, p = .40, SIMS F(1.90) = 2.71, p = .11, DES-T F(1.90) = 2.01, p = .16; BSI-18 F(1.90) = .30, p = .60.^ should read BWe also ran thisMANOVAwith working experience as a covariate, and none of the results reached significance: λ = .97, F(3.89) = .98, p = .40, SIMS F(1.90) = 2.71, p = .11, DES-T F(1.90) = 2.01, p = .16; BSI-18 F(1.90) = .30, p = .60.”.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-282
JournalPSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures: an Explorative Study Among Western and Non-Western Experts (vol 10, pg 274, 2017)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this