Erratum

L. Subramanian, L. Skottnik, W. M. Cox, M. Lührs, R. McNamara, K. Hood, G. Watson, J. R. Whittaker, A. N. Williams, R. Sakhuja, N. Ihssen, R. Goebel, R. Playle, D. E. J. Linden

Research output: Contribution to journalErratum / corrigendum / retractionsAcademic

Abstract

In the article “Neurofeedback Training versus Treatment-as-Usual for Alcohol Dependence: Results of an Early-Phase Randomized Controlled Trial and Neuroimaging Correlates” [Eur Addict Res. 2021. DOI: 10.1159/000513448] by Subramanian et al., the authors found that fMRI analyses were erroneous, leading to altered results of the ROI analysis (Fig. 3; online suppl. figures S1–S3; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000517465; χ2 results) and whole-brain analysis (Fig. 2). The corrected results confirm the feasibility of the alcohol-cue neurofeedback training but do not provide evidence that up-regulation of the neurofeedback signal in the alternative goals condition was feasible for participants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-397
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Addiction Research
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Cite this