L. Subramanian, L. Skottnik, W. M. Cox, M. Lührs, R. McNamara, K. Hood, G. Watson, J. R. Whittaker, A. N. Williams, R. Sakhuja, N. Ihssen, R. Goebel, R. Playle, D. E. J. Linden

Research output: Contribution to journalErratum / corrigendum / retractionsAcademic


In the article “Neurofeedback Training versus Treatment-as-Usual for Alcohol Dependence: Results of an Early-Phase Randomized Controlled Trial and Neuroimaging Correlates” [Eur Addict Res. 2021. DOI: 10.1159/000513448] by Subramanian et al., the authors found that fMRI analyses were erroneous, leading to altered results of the ROI analysis (Fig. 3; online suppl. figures S1–S3; for all online suppl. material, see; χ2 results) and whole-brain analysis (Fig. 2). The corrected results confirm the feasibility of the alcohol-cue neurofeedback training but do not provide evidence that up-regulation of the neurofeedback signal in the alternative goals condition was feasible for participants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-397
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Addiction Research
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Cite this