Epistemic (un)certainty in times of crisis: The role of coherence as a social convention in the European Neighbourhood Policy after the Arab Spring

Michal Natorski*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Academic wisdom assumes that crises precipitate institutional and policy changes in domestic and international politics. However, the relation between crises and policy outcomes is under-theorised. This article conceptualises epistemic coherence as a factor that links crises and their consequences through policy continuity. Crises expose contradictions and inconsistencies, which create uncertainty. Therefore, actors seek to recover the epistemic certainty provided by coherence, which tacitly informs, structures and simplifies actors' interpretation of reality, even during crisis. For this reason, the role of coherence in policy ideas and institutional rules remains essential to understanding policy continuity. This article illustrates the role of coherence in the policy continuity of the European Neighbourhood Policy in the context of the Arab Spring and the changes in the institutional architecture of European Union foreign policy during 2010-2011.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)646-670
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coherence
  • European Neighbourhood Policy
  • European Union
  • Crisis
  • Epistemology
  • Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic (un)certainty in times of crisis: The role of coherence as a social convention in the European Neighbourhood Policy after the Arab Spring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this