Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research

Kayte Spector-Bagdady*, Raymond G. De Vries, Michele G. Gornick, Andrew G. Shuman, Sharon Kardia, Jodyn Platt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Medical biobanks often struggle to obtain sustainable funding. Commercialization of specimens is one solution, but disclosure of commercial interests to potential contributors can be dissuasive. Recent revisions to the federal human subjects research regulations will soon mandate such commercialization disclosure in some circumstances, which raises questions about implications for practice. In this nationally representative, probability-based survey sample of the US adult population, we found that 67 percent of participants agreed that clear notification of potential commercialization of biospecimens is warranted, but only 23 percent were comfortable with such use. Sixty-two percent believed that profits should be used only to support future research, and 41 percent supported sharing profits with the public. We also considered other factors related to disclosure in our analysis and argue for a "disclosure plus" standard: informing potential contributors that their biospecimens might be accessed by commercial organizations and explaining how profits would be used to both enhance transparency and facilitate contributors' altruistic motivations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1313-1320
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • PUBLIC SUPPORT
  • COMMERCIALIZATION
  • TRUST
  • IMPACT

Cite this