TY - JOUR
T1 - Enabling and embedding circularity goals in housing cooperatives
AU - Van Opstal, Wim
AU - Bocken, Nancy
AU - Brusselaers, Jan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the Flemish Government (Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen) through the VLAIO \u201CLiving Lab Hybride Wonen\u201D project, and funding from the European Research Council (ERC), project Circular X, grant agreement No 850159. They also would like to thank Wim Debacker and interview respondents for valuable feedback and discussions. All remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
PY - 2025/9/1
Y1 - 2025/9/1
N2 - Shifting towards a circular economy in the built environment is considered an important step toward fostering environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. Housing cooperatives, established to provide affordable and democratically governed housing, may offer structural advantages for embedding circularity - but their role in circular transitions remains underexplored. This study investigates how cooperative governance may influence the implementation of circular strategies, including circular design, product-service systems, and shared resource models, across different housing types. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with housing professionals, cooperative representatives, service providers, and policymakers, we assess the comparative institutional advantages and limitations of cooperatives in enabling circular transitions. Our findings indicate that housing cooperatives can mitigate market failures and overcome split incentives through collective ownership, long-term planning, and participatory governance. These features help facilitate lifecycle-based investments, bundled procurement, and shared infrastructure. However, cooperatives also face key challenges, including complex decision-making, limited access to finance, and regulatory barriers. This paper contributes to the understanding of alternative housing models for urban sustainability by offering insights into how cooperative-led initiatives can support circular innovation. It identifies boundary conditions for aligning stakeholder perspectives and embedding circular strategies within cooperative housing, helping to inform inclusive, community-based responses to climate and resource challenges.
AB - Shifting towards a circular economy in the built environment is considered an important step toward fostering environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. Housing cooperatives, established to provide affordable and democratically governed housing, may offer structural advantages for embedding circularity - but their role in circular transitions remains underexplored. This study investigates how cooperative governance may influence the implementation of circular strategies, including circular design, product-service systems, and shared resource models, across different housing types. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with housing professionals, cooperative representatives, service providers, and policymakers, we assess the comparative institutional advantages and limitations of cooperatives in enabling circular transitions. Our findings indicate that housing cooperatives can mitigate market failures and overcome split incentives through collective ownership, long-term planning, and participatory governance. These features help facilitate lifecycle-based investments, bundled procurement, and shared infrastructure. However, cooperatives also face key challenges, including complex decision-making, limited access to finance, and regulatory barriers. This paper contributes to the understanding of alternative housing models for urban sustainability by offering insights into how cooperative-led initiatives can support circular innovation. It identifies boundary conditions for aligning stakeholder perspectives and embedding circular strategies within cooperative housing, helping to inform inclusive, community-based responses to climate and resource challenges.
KW - Circular business models
KW - Circular economy
KW - Circular society
KW - Governance
KW - Just transition
KW - Market failures
U2 - 10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200272
DO - 10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200272
M3 - Article
SN - 2667-3789
VL - 27
JO - Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances
JF - Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances
M1 - 200272
ER -