Employment prospects and firm-based training - Evidence from opening the Swiss-German border

  • Caroline Neuber-Pohl*
  • , Damiano Pregaldini
  • , Uschi Backes-Gellner
  • , Sandra Dummert
  • , Harald Pfeifer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We study how improved wage opportunities for skilled workers affect firm-based training, using the 2002 opening of the Swiss labor market to German commuters as a natural experiment. The reform triggered a large outflow of skilled workers from German border regions, prompting firms to expand apprenticeship training. Using a Difference-in-Differences approach, we find a significant increase in the number of apprenticeships in affected firms in Germany despite unchanged apprentice wages. This pattern is consistent with an outward shift in apprentice supply: higher wages for skilled workers across the border made apprenticeships more attractive to young people. Our findings suggest that improvements in skilled workers' wage prospects, rather than adjusting apprentice pay, may help to address training gaps and alleviate skill shortages.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102848
Number of pages25
JournalLabour Economics
Volume99
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2026

JEL classifications

  • j21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
  • j22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
  • j61 - "Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers"
  • r23 - "Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics: Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics"

Keywords

  • Skill shortage
  • Free movement of labor
  • Negative labor supply shock
  • Wage effects
  • Training incentives
  • Apprenticeship supply and demand
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPACT
  • INVESTMENT
  • WAGES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Employment prospects and firm-based training - Evidence from opening the Swiss-German border'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this