Emergent structures in faculty hiring networks, and the effects of mobility on academic performance

Robin Cowan, Giulia Rossello*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper is about the south african job market for ph.ds. Ph.d. To first job mobility involves the preferences of both the hiring institution and the candidate. Both want to make the best choice and here institutional prestige plays a crucial role. A university’s prestige is an emergent property of hiring interactions, so we use a network perspective to measure it. Using this emergent ordering, we compare the subsequent scientific performance of scholars with different changes in the prestige hierarchy. We ask how movements between universities of different prestige from ph.d. To first job correlates with academic performance. We use data of south african scholars from 1970 to 2012 and we find that those who make large movements in terms of prestige have lower research ratings than those who do not. Further, looking only those with large prestige movements, those with higher prestige ph.ds or first jobs have higher research ratings throughout their careers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-562
Number of pages36
JournalScientometrics
Volume117
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Academia
  • South Africa
  • Faculty hiring network
  • Institutional prestige
  • Institutional stratification
  • Scholars research performance
  • University system
  • Matched pair analysis
  • RANKED GRADUATE PROGRAMS
  • UNIVERSITY PRESTIGE
  • SCIENCE
  • PRODUCTIVITY
  • EDUCATION
  • LINKAGES
  • CAREER
  • JOB
  • PSYCHOLOGISTS
  • MODEL

Cite this

@article{61b8d7261f4540c796956fa81b299da0,
title = "Emergent structures in faculty hiring networks, and the effects of mobility on academic performance",
abstract = "This paper is about the south african job market for ph.ds. Ph.d. To first job mobility involves the preferences of both the hiring institution and the candidate. Both want to make the best choice and here institutional prestige plays a crucial role. A university’s prestige is an emergent property of hiring interactions, so we use a network perspective to measure it. Using this emergent ordering, we compare the subsequent scientific performance of scholars with different changes in the prestige hierarchy. We ask how movements between universities of different prestige from ph.d. To first job correlates with academic performance. We use data of south african scholars from 1970 to 2012 and we find that those who make large movements in terms of prestige have lower research ratings than those who do not. Further, looking only those with large prestige movements, those with higher prestige ph.ds or first jobs have higher research ratings throughout their careers.",
keywords = "Academia, South Africa, Faculty hiring network, Institutional prestige, Institutional stratification, Scholars research performance, University system, Matched pair analysis, RANKED GRADUATE PROGRAMS, UNIVERSITY PRESTIGE, SCIENCE, PRODUCTIVITY, EDUCATION, LINKAGES, CAREER, JOB, PSYCHOLOGISTS, MODEL",
author = "Robin Cowan and Giulia Rossello",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-018-2858-8",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "527--562",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer, Cham",
number = "1",

}

Emergent structures in faculty hiring networks, and the effects of mobility on academic performance. / Cowan, Robin; Rossello, Giulia.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 117, No. 1, 10.2018, p. 527-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergent structures in faculty hiring networks, and the effects of mobility on academic performance

AU - Cowan, Robin

AU - Rossello, Giulia

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - This paper is about the south african job market for ph.ds. Ph.d. To first job mobility involves the preferences of both the hiring institution and the candidate. Both want to make the best choice and here institutional prestige plays a crucial role. A university’s prestige is an emergent property of hiring interactions, so we use a network perspective to measure it. Using this emergent ordering, we compare the subsequent scientific performance of scholars with different changes in the prestige hierarchy. We ask how movements between universities of different prestige from ph.d. To first job correlates with academic performance. We use data of south african scholars from 1970 to 2012 and we find that those who make large movements in terms of prestige have lower research ratings than those who do not. Further, looking only those with large prestige movements, those with higher prestige ph.ds or first jobs have higher research ratings throughout their careers.

AB - This paper is about the south african job market for ph.ds. Ph.d. To first job mobility involves the preferences of both the hiring institution and the candidate. Both want to make the best choice and here institutional prestige plays a crucial role. A university’s prestige is an emergent property of hiring interactions, so we use a network perspective to measure it. Using this emergent ordering, we compare the subsequent scientific performance of scholars with different changes in the prestige hierarchy. We ask how movements between universities of different prestige from ph.d. To first job correlates with academic performance. We use data of south african scholars from 1970 to 2012 and we find that those who make large movements in terms of prestige have lower research ratings than those who do not. Further, looking only those with large prestige movements, those with higher prestige ph.ds or first jobs have higher research ratings throughout their careers.

KW - Academia

KW - South Africa

KW - Faculty hiring network

KW - Institutional prestige

KW - Institutional stratification

KW - Scholars research performance

KW - University system

KW - Matched pair analysis

KW - RANKED GRADUATE PROGRAMS

KW - UNIVERSITY PRESTIGE

KW - SCIENCE

KW - PRODUCTIVITY

KW - EDUCATION

KW - LINKAGES

KW - CAREER

KW - JOB

KW - PSYCHOLOGISTS

KW - MODEL

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-018-2858-8

DO - 10.1007/s11192-018-2858-8

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 527

EP - 562

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 1

ER -