Electing the Experts: Expertise and Independence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Independent experts are employed in international organizations to carry out a variety of functions, including conducting independent evaluations of state performance in a given policy area. In the field of human rights, a well-known example of the use of independent expertise in public organizations is that of the United Nations treaty bodies, committees of independent experts in charge of monitoring state compliance with the major United Nations human rights treaties. Considering the sensitive tasks that these experts perform, and the fact that they are elected by states, the question of whether they actually possess the required levels of independence and expertise to fulfil their role arises. This article proposes and applies a framework to study the formal and informal processes leading to the appointment of expert committees in international bodies, and to assess their level of expertise and independence. Data were collected by means of an original survey and 40 semi-structured interviews. The article shows that the overall level of independent expertise possessed by committees is surprisingly high when considering the highly political electoral process. Therefore, it argues that to study the expertise and independence of expert committees, one should conceive of them as groups that might be able to maintain a certain independence from the states that have elected them.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1354066118819138
Pages (from-to)826-851
Number of pages26
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date4 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • 3RD WAVE
  • EPISTEMIC COMMUNITIES
  • Expertise
  • INFORMATION
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • LEGITIMATION
  • ORGANIZATIONS
  • POLITICS
  • POWER
  • United Nations
  • global institutions
  • human rights
  • monitoring
  • treaty bodies

Cite this

@article{46c12e816f5f40de9b59a6d46b8e71b3,
title = "Electing the Experts: Expertise and Independence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies",
abstract = "Independent experts are employed in international organizations to carry out a variety of functions, including conducting independent evaluations of state performance in a given policy area. In the field of human rights, a well-known example of the use of independent expertise in public organizations is that of the United Nations treaty bodies, committees of independent experts in charge of monitoring state compliance with the major United Nations human rights treaties. Considering the sensitive tasks that these experts perform, and the fact that they are elected by states, the question of whether they actually possess the required levels of independence and expertise to fulfil their role arises. This article proposes and applies a framework to study the formal and informal processes leading to the appointment of expert committees in international bodies, and to assess their level of expertise and independence. Data were collected by means of an original survey and 40 semi-structured interviews. The article shows that the overall level of independent expertise possessed by committees is surprisingly high when considering the highly political electoral process. Therefore, it argues that to study the expertise and independence of expert committees, one should conceive of them as groups that might be able to maintain a certain independence from the states that have elected them.",
keywords = "3RD WAVE, EPISTEMIC COMMUNITIES, Expertise, INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, LEGITIMATION, ORGANIZATIONS, POLITICS, POWER, United Nations, global institutions, human rights, monitoring, treaty bodies",
author = "Valentina Carraro",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1354066118819138",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "826--851",
journal = "European Journal of International Relations",
issn = "1354-0661",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Electing the Experts: Expertise and Independence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. / Carraro, Valentina.

In: European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1354066118819138, 09.2019, p. 826-851.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electing the Experts: Expertise and Independence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies

AU - Carraro, Valentina

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Independent experts are employed in international organizations to carry out a variety of functions, including conducting independent evaluations of state performance in a given policy area. In the field of human rights, a well-known example of the use of independent expertise in public organizations is that of the United Nations treaty bodies, committees of independent experts in charge of monitoring state compliance with the major United Nations human rights treaties. Considering the sensitive tasks that these experts perform, and the fact that they are elected by states, the question of whether they actually possess the required levels of independence and expertise to fulfil their role arises. This article proposes and applies a framework to study the formal and informal processes leading to the appointment of expert committees in international bodies, and to assess their level of expertise and independence. Data were collected by means of an original survey and 40 semi-structured interviews. The article shows that the overall level of independent expertise possessed by committees is surprisingly high when considering the highly political electoral process. Therefore, it argues that to study the expertise and independence of expert committees, one should conceive of them as groups that might be able to maintain a certain independence from the states that have elected them.

AB - Independent experts are employed in international organizations to carry out a variety of functions, including conducting independent evaluations of state performance in a given policy area. In the field of human rights, a well-known example of the use of independent expertise in public organizations is that of the United Nations treaty bodies, committees of independent experts in charge of monitoring state compliance with the major United Nations human rights treaties. Considering the sensitive tasks that these experts perform, and the fact that they are elected by states, the question of whether they actually possess the required levels of independence and expertise to fulfil their role arises. This article proposes and applies a framework to study the formal and informal processes leading to the appointment of expert committees in international bodies, and to assess their level of expertise and independence. Data were collected by means of an original survey and 40 semi-structured interviews. The article shows that the overall level of independent expertise possessed by committees is surprisingly high when considering the highly political electoral process. Therefore, it argues that to study the expertise and independence of expert committees, one should conceive of them as groups that might be able to maintain a certain independence from the states that have elected them.

KW - 3RD WAVE

KW - EPISTEMIC COMMUNITIES

KW - Expertise

KW - INFORMATION

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - LEGITIMATION

KW - ORGANIZATIONS

KW - POLITICS

KW - POWER

KW - United Nations

KW - global institutions

KW - human rights

KW - monitoring

KW - treaty bodies

U2 - 10.1177/1354066118819138

DO - 10.1177/1354066118819138

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 826

EP - 851

JO - European Journal of International Relations

JF - European Journal of International Relations

SN - 1354-0661

IS - 3

M1 - 1354066118819138

ER -