Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of durvalumab in patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumours

  • B.S. Geurts
  • , T.W. Battaglia
  • , J.M.V. Henegouwen
  • , L.J. Zeverijn
  • , G.F. de Wit
  • , L.R. Hoes
  • , H. van der Wijngaart
  • , V. van der Noort
  • , P. Roepman
  • , W.W.J. de Leng
  • , A.M.L. Jansen
  • , F.L. Opdam
  • , M.J.A. de Jonge
  • , G.A. Cirkel
  • , M. Labots
  • , A. Hoeben
  • , E.D. Kerver
  • , A.D. Bins
  • , F.G.L. Erdkamp
  • , J.M. van Rooijen
  • D. Houtsma, M.P. Hendriks, J.W.B. de Groot, H.M.W. Verheul, H. Gelderblom, E.E. Voest*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BackgroundIn this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). This is a clinical study in which patients are treated with drugs outside their labeled indication, based on their tumour molecular profile.Patients and methodsPatients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours who had exhausted all standard of care options were eligible. Patients were treated with durvalumab. The primary endpoints were clinical benefit ((CB): objective response (OR) or stable disease >= 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1, up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB in stage 1. At baseline, fresh frozen biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses.ResultsTwenty-six patients with 10 different cancer types were included. Two patients (2/26, 8%) were considered as non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. CB was observed in 13 patients (13/26, 50%) with an OR in 7 patients (7/26, 27%). The remaining 11 patients (11/26, 42%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5 months (95% CI, 2-not reached) and 14 months (95% CI, 5-not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. We found a significantly higher structural variant (SV) burden in patients without CB. Additionally, we observed a significant enrichment of JAK1 frameshift mutations and a significantly lower IFN-gamma expression in patients without CB.ConclusionDurvalumab was generally well-tolerated and provided durable responses in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours. High SV burden, JAK1 frameshift mutations and low IFN-gamma expression were associated with a lack of CB; this provides a rationale for larger studies to validate these findings.
Original languageEnglish
Article number205
Number of pages14
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Durvalumab
  • Immunotherapy
  • Microsatellite instability
  • Mismatch repair deficiency
  • Precision medicine
  • OPEN-LABEL
  • RESISTANCE
  • PEMBROLIZUMAB
  • BLOCKADE
  • CRITERIA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of durvalumab in patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumours'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this