Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method

Fren T.Y. Smulders*, J. Leon Kenemans, Albert Kok

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) can be used to index the start of response activation. The onset of the average LRP can be computed as the latency at which the component starts to deviate significantly from zero or as the latency at which a certain proportion of its maximum amplitude is attained. The properties of both measures as estimates of the mean onset latency of the LRP were examined. Experiment 1 was a simulation study in which the mean onset latencies were known. Results indicated different types of bias for the two measures and greater reliability for a proportional measure. In Experiment 2, the sensitivity to bias, consistency, and linearity of both measures were evaluated in a set of empirical data. By all three criteria, a proportional onset measure was superior. It is recommended that the choice of the measure should depend on the hypothesis to be tested, so that conclusions are based on the more conservative test.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-205
Number of pages12
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Latency variation
  • Lateralized readiness potential
  • Simulations
  • Stimulus degradation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this