TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Treatment on Spinal Cord Lesion Formation in Relapse-Onset Multiple Sclerosis
T2 - An MSBase Registry Study
AU - Kreiter, Daniel
AU - Kalincik, Tomas
AU - Hupperts, Raymond
AU - Patti, Francesco
AU - Spitaleri, Daniele
AU - Foschi, Matteo
AU - Surcinelli, Andrea
AU - Maimone, Davide
AU - Yamout, Bassem
AU - Khoury, Samia J.
AU - Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
AU - Ozakbas, Serkan
AU - Gerlach, Oliver
AU - Turkoglu, R.
AU - Soysal, A.
AU - Boz, C.
AU - Al-Asmi, A.
AU - Alkhaboori, J.
AU - Amato, M. P.
AU - Onofrj, M.
AU - Lugaresi, A.
AU - Besora, S.
AU - Sanchez-Menoyo, J. L.
AU - Lapointe, E.
AU - Grand’Maison, F.
AU - Grammond, P.
AU - Butzkueven, H.
AU - Van der Walt, A.
AU - Taylor, B. V.
AU - McCombe, P. A.
AU - Garber, J. Y.
AU - Skibina, O. G.
AU - Buzzard, K. A.
AU - John, N. A.
AU - Shaw, C.
AU - Barnett, M. H.
AU - the MSBase Study Group
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Background: Spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) have considerable impact on disability. High-efficacy disease-modifying treatments (hDMTs) are associated with greater reduction of relapses and new brain lesions compared to low-efficacy treatments (lDMTs). Knowledge on the impact of DMTs on cord lesion formation is limited as these outcome measures were not included in MS treatment trials. This study aims to investigate whether hDMTs reduce the formation of cord lesions more effectively than lDMTs. Methods: Patients with relapse-onset MS, a cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 6 months before/after initiation of their first DMT and ≥1 cord MRI at follow-up (interval > 6 months) were extracted from the MSBase registry (ACTRN12605000455662). Patients treated with hDMTs ≥90% or lDMTs ≥90% of follow-up duration were considered the hDMT and lDMT groups, respectively. Matching was performed using propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazards of new cord lesions, brain lesions and relapses. Results: Ninety-four and 783 satisfied hDMT and lDMT group criteria, respectively. Seventy-seven hDMT patients were matched to 184 lDMT patients. In the hDMT group there was no evidence of reduction of new cord lesions (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99 [95% CI 0.51, 1.92], p = 0.97), while there were fewer new brain lesions (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.10, 0.49], p < 0.001) and fewer relapses (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.28, 0.72], p = 0.004). Conclusion: A potential discrepancy exists in the effect of hDMTs over lDMTs in preventing spinal cord lesions versus brain lesions and relapses. While hDMTs provided a significant reduction for the latter when compared to lDMTs, there was no significant reduction in new spinal cord lesions.
AB - Background: Spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) have considerable impact on disability. High-efficacy disease-modifying treatments (hDMTs) are associated with greater reduction of relapses and new brain lesions compared to low-efficacy treatments (lDMTs). Knowledge on the impact of DMTs on cord lesion formation is limited as these outcome measures were not included in MS treatment trials. This study aims to investigate whether hDMTs reduce the formation of cord lesions more effectively than lDMTs. Methods: Patients with relapse-onset MS, a cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 6 months before/after initiation of their first DMT and ≥1 cord MRI at follow-up (interval > 6 months) were extracted from the MSBase registry (ACTRN12605000455662). Patients treated with hDMTs ≥90% or lDMTs ≥90% of follow-up duration were considered the hDMT and lDMT groups, respectively. Matching was performed using propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazards of new cord lesions, brain lesions and relapses. Results: Ninety-four and 783 satisfied hDMT and lDMT group criteria, respectively. Seventy-seven hDMT patients were matched to 184 lDMT patients. In the hDMT group there was no evidence of reduction of new cord lesions (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99 [95% CI 0.51, 1.92], p = 0.97), while there were fewer new brain lesions (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.10, 0.49], p < 0.001) and fewer relapses (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.28, 0.72], p = 0.004). Conclusion: A potential discrepancy exists in the effect of hDMTs over lDMTs in preventing spinal cord lesions versus brain lesions and relapses. While hDMTs provided a significant reduction for the latter when compared to lDMTs, there was no significant reduction in new spinal cord lesions.
U2 - 10.1007/s40263-024-01115-x
DO - 10.1007/s40263-024-01115-x
M3 - Article
SN - 1172-7047
VL - 38
SP - 921
EP - 930
JO - Cns Drugs
JF - Cns Drugs
IS - 11
ER -