Abstract
In the various theories of endogenous or semi-endogenous growth, it is argued that RandD drives productivity growth through increased choice or quality improvements in intermediate inputs or final goods (Grossman and Helpman, 1991; Aghion and Howitt, 1998; Barro and Sala-i-Martin, 2004). Private rates of return to RandD have been estimated to be in the 20 to 30 per cent range (see Hall, Mairesse and Mohnen [2010] for a survey). Ugur, Trushin, Solomon and Guidi (2016), in their meta-analysis of the empirical literature, conclude that the returns are very heterogeneous, maybe lower than the range reported by Hall et al. (2010), but still positive.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Innovation Systems, Policy and Management |
| Editors | Jorge Niosi |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 53-78 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108529525 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-108-42383-0 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of direct and indirect R&D support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver