Effectiveness of direct and indirect R&D support

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

In the various theories of endogenous or semi-endogenous growth, it is argued that RandD drives productivity growth through increased choice or quality improvements in intermediate inputs or final goods (Grossman and Helpman, 1991; Aghion and Howitt, 1998; Barro and Sala-i-Martin, 2004). Private rates of return to RandD have been estimated to be in the 20 to 30 per cent range (see Hall, Mairesse and Mohnen [2010] for a survey). Ugur, Trushin, Solomon and Guidi (2016), in their meta-analysis of the empirical literature, conclude that the returns are very heterogeneous, maybe lower than the range reported by Hall et al. (2010), but still positive.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInnovation Systems, Policy and Management
EditorsJorge Niosi
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages53-78
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781108529525
ISBN (Print)978-1-108-42383-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of direct and indirect R&D support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this