TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective Knowledge Transmission and Learning in Agriculture
T2 - Evidence from a Randomised Training Experiment in Ethiopia
AU - Mesfin, Hiwot
AU - Tessema, Yohannis M.
AU - Tirivayi, Nyasha
AU - Nillesen, Eleonora
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from CODESRIA’s Meaning Making Research Initiative, grant number MRI/CTR 9/2018-2019. Wealso would like to thank the participant farmers; the extension agent and model farmer trainers; the Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Institute; the district administration offices; and, the enumerators for all the support. We also thank Dr Chanyalew Seyoum for his feedback on our qualitative research design. Lastly, we would like to thank the four anonymous internal reviewers and the two anonymous external reviewers for the comments and suggestions that have improved the manuscript immensely. Any remaining errors are our own.
PY - 2023/3/23
Y1 - 2023/3/23
N2 - In this article, we discuss a study to identify an effective agricultural knowledge transfer channel for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia, using a randomised training experiment together with focus group discussions, key informant interviews and a survey. We also examine the factors that determine learning among smallholder farmers. Our results revealed that involving extension agents and model farmers leads to above-average knowledge transfer. However, learning from extension agents is significantly more effective than learning from model farmers. Additionally, we found that trust, effort, and locus of control are important determinants of learning. On the other hand, we found no evidence that farmers exert more effort when they are trained by extension agents, hence this rules out effort as a mechanism for higher learning from the extension agents. Based on these results, we conclude that, on average, the extension agent system is more effective at conveying agricultural knowledge than model farmers are and that policy-makers can use the two channels as complements rather than substitutes.
AB - In this article, we discuss a study to identify an effective agricultural knowledge transfer channel for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia, using a randomised training experiment together with focus group discussions, key informant interviews and a survey. We also examine the factors that determine learning among smallholder farmers. Our results revealed that involving extension agents and model farmers leads to above-average knowledge transfer. However, learning from extension agents is significantly more effective than learning from model farmers. Additionally, we found that trust, effort, and locus of control are important determinants of learning. On the other hand, we found no evidence that farmers exert more effort when they are trained by extension agents, hence this rules out effort as a mechanism for higher learning from the extension agents. Based on these results, we conclude that, on average, the extension agent system is more effective at conveying agricultural knowledge than model farmers are and that policy-makers can use the two channels as complements rather than substitutes.
KW - agricultural extension service
KW - Ethiopia
KW - Knowledge communication
KW - learning
KW - model farmer
KW - training experiment
U2 - 10.57054/ad.v48i1.3039
DO - 10.57054/ad.v48i1.3039
M3 - Article
SN - 0850-3907
VL - 48
SP - 213
EP - 244
JO - Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement
JF - Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement
IS - 1
ER -