Effect of switching from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon on time in therapeutic range and INR variability: A cohort study

J.H.A. van Miert*, N.J.G.M. Veeger, A.J. ten Cate-Hoek, M. Piersma-Wichers, K. Meijer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BackgroundTreatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) requires a high proportion of time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and a low international normalised ratio (INR) variability to be maximally safe and effective. Switching from short-acting acenocoumarol to long-acting phenprocoumon could improve VKA control.AimsWe assessed whether switching from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon improves the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and INR variability.Methods and resultsIn a retrospective cohort with data on 236,957 patients-years of VKA management from two first-line anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands, we identified 124 patients in target range 2-3, 269 patients in target range 2-3.5 and 98 patients in target range 2.5-3.5 who switched from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon. They were matched in a 1:2 ratio to non-switching controls using propensity score matching. Over the first 180 days after a switch, switchers' TTR declined 5 (95% CI 1 to 10), 10 (95% CI 7 to 13) and 5 (95% CI 0 to 11) percentage points relative to non-switchers, in target ranges 2-3, 2-3.5 and 2.5-3.5. Anticoagulation was more often supra-therapeutic in switchers, and switchers had a higher INR variability. In the following 180 days, TTR in switchers became 1 (95% CI -4 to 6), 4 (95% CI 0 to 7) and 6 (95% CI 1 to 12) percentage points better than in non-switchers. Switchers' INRs were much more stable than non-switchers'.ConclusionEventually, a switch from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon leads to a higher TTR and a lower INR variability. However, this is preceded by a transition period with opposite effects. An improved conversion algorithm could possibly shorten the transition period. Until then, physicians and patients should decide whether switching is worth the increased risk during the transition phase.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0235639
Number of pages17
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • management
  • normalized ratio variability
  • oral anticoagulant-therapy
  • outcomes
  • quality
  • stability
  • vitamin-k antagonists
  • warfarin
  • NORMALIZED RATIO VARIABILITY
  • QUALITY
  • MANAGEMENT
  • VITAMIN-K ANTAGONISTS
  • STABILITY
  • ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY
  • WARFARIN
  • OUTCOMES

Cite this